What's Protected Under ADA Disability Law

Bob Gregg, partner in Boardman Law Firm, shares his roundup of diversity-related legal issues. He can be reached at rgregg@boardmanlawfirm.com.

Court allows obesity as perceived disability. In Frank v. Lawrence Union Free School District, the court has allowed an ADA case to proceed to trial on the “perceived disability” of obesity. A probationary math teacher, weighing 350 pounds, received good evaluations and the recommendations for permanent appointment from his direct supervisors and principals. An assistant superintendent overruled the recommendation, denying further employment. Evidence showed the assistant superintendent had made remarks about the teacher being “too big and sloppy” and that his size and weight would interfere with his duties and were not conducive to learning. These comments about his weight significantly impairing job duties led the court to believe there was a perceived disability under the ADA. The assistant superintendent’s attempted defense, that the teacher had poor performance and ineffective teaching methods, was rejected as pure pretext in light of the uniformly good performance evaluations and positive recommendations of several people who regularly observed him in the classroom (E.D. NY, 2010).

Doctor could not safely treat patients. A doctor, during his post-graduation internship, misdiagnosed patients, prescribed wrong medications, prescribed 10 times the proper dosage of the correct medication and once identified a living patient as being dead. He ignored directions from senior physicians and was “extremely argumentative” when errors were discussed with him. After diagnosis of “possible attention deficit disorder,” the doctor asked for accommodations of a significantly reduced number of patients and a “more compassionate environment.” But the hospital could not reasonably reduce the number of patients below the level required for interns by the Accreditation Council for Graduate Education; a special team of doctors had been formed to provide coaching with his notes/charts and assist when he expressed having difficulties. The doctor’s performance, however, did not improve and he was discharged. He subsequently sued under the ADA for “perceived disability” discrimination. In Shir v. U. of Maryland Medical Systems Corp., the court dismissed the case, finding that the doctor was not a “qualified person with a disability”; he could not perform the work even with accommodation. “No reasonable jury could find that he provided safe and appropriate care for patients,” stated the court (4th Cir., 2010).

Click here to see The DiversityInc Top 10 Companies for People With Disabilities.

ADA does not excuse drunk driving and injury. The chief of a county police unit had an off-duty vehicle accident, causing the hospitalization of two people in the car he hit. He tested at three times the legal limit for alcohol and the state suspended his driver’s license, while the county terminated employment. The ex-chief then sued, claiming that he had the disability of alcoholism and the county should have allowed him to seek treatment and recover rather than fire him. He also argued that the county was premature, not waiting to see if he would be convicted for an OWI (operating while intoxicated). But the plaintiff lost on both counts. Although the ADA covers a “history of dependency and treatment” as a disability and prevents discharge because someone has a diagnosis or history of dependency, it does not protect a person from actions caused by active use or immunize an employee from violating rules that could cause discharge of any other employee. The OWI violated police-department rules. Driving was also an essential job function; without a license, the police chief could not effectively perform the job, and there was no reasonable accommodation. In addition, in Budde v. Kane County, Illinois, the court found that an employer is not required to wait for the slow process and greater burden of proof of the criminal-judicial process. It had independent evidence sufficient to show violation of employment rules and could act accordingly (7th Cir., 2010).

Safe driving concerns warrant medical evaluation. The ADA allows the medical evaluation of employees based on significant job-related factors. In Kirkish v. Mesa Imports Inc. (D. Arizona, 2010), an employee’s job involved significant driving. But a neuropathy condition required him to take large doses of painkillers, which might impair his concentration and driving. So the company requested information from the employee’s doctor, who refused to certify the employee as clearly safe to drive. As a result, the employee was let go for being unable to do a significant job duty; he subsequently sued. The court ruled that the employer had a valid safety concern, and the medical-evaluation request was justified under the ADA. The doctor’s failure to certify safety rendered the employee unable to effectively perform the job.

Latest News

Johnson & Johnson Names Dr. Nadja West, Retired United States Army Lieutenant General and Former United States Army Surgeon General to its Board of Directors

Originally published on jnj.com. Johnson & Johnson is a DiversityInc Hall of Fame company. Johnson & Johnson announced today that Dr. Nadja West, retired United States Army lieutenant general and former United States Army Surgeon General has been appointed to its Board of Directors. “I am pleased to welcome Dr….


AT&T Celebrates the Aspire Accelerator Class of 2020

Originally published on ATT.com. AT&T is a DiversityInc Hall of Fame company. Immersed Games and Social Cipher win annual “Pitches with Purpose” competition; each receive $25K award Yesterday, eight education technology companies graduated from the Aspire Accelerator and competed in an all-virtual “Shark Tank”-style “Pitches with Purpose” for two $25,000 prizes…

NelsonHall Recognizes ADP as a Leader in the Efficiency Focused NEAT Graph for Cloud-Based HR Transformation Services 2020 Evaluation

Originally published on ADP.com. ADP ranked No. 4 on The DiversityInc Top 50 Companies for Diversity list in 2020. ADP acknowledged for improving processes, lowering costs and providing better decision-making driven by analytics and automation for clients Industry analyst firm NelsonHall has positioned ADP as a Leader in its Efficiency Focused…


Humana CEO Bruce Broussard Named Businessperson of the Year

Originally posted on Humana LinkedIn. Humana ranked No. 25 for The DiversityInc Top 50 Companies for Diversity list in 2020. We’d like to congratulate CEO Bruce Broussard on being named one of Fortune‘s 2020 Businesspersons of the Year. “Since being named CEO of the health insurer in 2013, Broussard has continued Humana’s push into…

Child studying to improve test scores

Test Scores Drop Dramatically for Black, Hispanic and Poor Children Due to COVID-19; Nasdaq Moves to Require Diversity for Listed Companies; and More

Math and reading test scores have dropped dramatically for Black, Hispanic and poor children due to COVID-19, new study warns. Results of lockdowns, home-schooling, and Zoom classrooms as a result of COVID-19 are starting to come in, and the numbers aren’t good. According to a review of more than 4…


The Platinum Plan: How Trump Increased His Black Vote by 50% and What We Can Learn From It

Do you know what Donald Trump’s “Platinum Plan” was? Most Black people I know do. Most white people have never heard of it. The plan — a two-page document released just weeks before the 2020 election — details the four pillars of Trump’s commitment to Black Americans (Opportunity, Security, Prosperity…

Hershey Statement on Cocoa Sustainability and Supporting the Living Income Differential

Originally published on thehersheycompany.com. Hershey’s commitment to improving cocoa farmer livelihoods and ensuring a long-term sustainable cocoa supply is unwavering. Solving the many challenges within cocoa production, such as low incomes, poverty, child labor and environmental protection will be possible only through collaboration and cooperation across industry, governments, and civil…