Supreme Court Upholds Housing Discrimination Protections

The Supreme Court on Thursday ruled that individuals affected by discriminatory housing practices can still seek remedies even if they cannot prove the discrimination was intentional.


In a sharply divided and surprising 5-4 ruling, the court upheld the notion that the Fair Housing Act of 1968 allows those affected to challenge unfair housing practices, such as lending rules, rental policies and zoning laws that have a harmful impact on minority groups, even if there is no proof that companies or government agencies intended to discriminate.

While courts previously had agreed that so-called “disparate impact” could be grounds for lawsuits against banks, governments, landlords and others who make housing decisions that disproportionately impact minorities, opponents challenging the law argue that it was intended only to ban intentional discrimination.

The theory of disparate impact in U.S. anti-discriminations law argues that practices that do not directly discriminate, yet have the effect of putting certain groups at a disadvantage, may be considered discriminatory and illegal if they have a disproportionate adverse impact on persons in a protected class.

“The court acknowledges the Fair Housing Act’s continuing role in moving the nation toward a more integrated society,” said Justice Anthony Kennedy, writing for the majority. “Recognition of disparate impact liability under the FHA also plays a role in uncovering discriminatory intent: It permits plaintiffs to counteract unconscious prejudices and disguised animus that escape easy classification as disparate treatment.”

Kennedy, joined by Justices Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Stephen Breyer, Elena Kagan and Sonia Sotomayor, said language in the housing law banning discrimination “because of race” allows for disparate impact cases, adding that those lawsuits “may prevent segregated housing patterns that might otherwise result from covert and illicit stereotyping.”

In dissent, Justice Samuel Alito, joined by Chief Justice John Roberts and Justices Antonin Scalia and Clarence Thomas, said disparate impact was not specifically allowed in the text of the housing law and allowing so was “a serious mistake [that] will have unfortunate consequences for local government, private enterprise, and those living in poverty.”

The latest case involved an appeal from Texas officials accused of violating the Fair Housing Act by awarding federal low-income housing vouchers in poor, minority neighborhoods rather than in majority-white suburbs.

The Inclusive Communities Project, Inc., a Dallas-based fair housing group, argued that even if there was no motive to discriminate, the policies still harmed Black residents. The group claimed the action was perpetuating segregated neighborhoods and denying Blacks a chance to move into areas with better schools and lower crime.

“This decision will have a very profound impact on millions of Americans going forward at a time when we need every tool we have in the arsenal of civil rights,”Dennis Parker of the American Civil Liberties Union racial justice program said in a statement last month in anticipation of the Supreme Court’s ruling.

The White House issued a statement saying the decision “reflects the reality that discrimination often operates not just out in the open, but in more hidden forms.”

Sherrilyn Ifill, president of NAACP Legal Defense Fund, told reporters outside the court that the housing law was critical in bridging the nation’s racial divide, especially in light of the church shooting in Charleston. “Anyone who has been paying attention in the last week knows that we can no longer afford to live the way we have as two separate bifurcated parts of this country.”

Latest News

women in politics

Women Remain Vastly Underrepresented in Local Government, Despite Conventional Wisdom Suggesting Otherwise

Vice President Kamala Harris and Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi sat behind President Biden during his first speech to a joint session of Congress on April 28 — representing the first time two women held such important and high-ranking political offices. Even after such a historic moment, the reality…

voter restriction

Florida Follows Georgia’s Lead, Approves Racist Anti-Voter Restrictions Aimed Primarily at Democrats and People of Color

Not content with letting Georgia be the only state in the South demonized for its bigoted and racist attacks on voter rights, Florida has jumped into the fray in issuing its own series of new and highly controversial “Jim Crow-esque” anti-voting restrictions aimed specifically at disenfranchising Democrats and voters of…

Kentucky Derby

Inspired by Protests Over Breonna Taylor’s Death, Humana and Kentucky Derby Festival Launch Diversity and Inclusion Initiative in Louisville

Ahead of the 147th Kentucky Derby on Saturday, May 1, Kentucky Derby officials and Humana (No. 25 on The DiversityInc Top 50 Companies for Diversity list in 2020) have announced a new equity initiative meant to make the race more accessible and welcoming to everyone, regardless of race, gender, age…

crimes against human ity

‘Crime Against Humanity’; Global Report Says the US Should Be Prosecuted in International Criminal Court for Ongoing Police Murders of Black Americans

In what has been described as a “devastating” report, human rights experts and lawyers have investigated and released a 188-page analysis of the ongoing police brutality and killing of Black Americans in the U.S. Their verdict: the country is guilty of “crimes against humanity” and should be prosecuted for its…

Tokyo, Olympics

Tokyo Olympics to Encourage Significant Increase in Gender Equality Among Event’s Corporate Sponsors

Besides simply being a showcase for some of the most talented and athletic men and women on the planet, the organizers of the Tokyo Olympics are hoping their event this summer can also help promote significant change in corporate culture, both in Japan and around the globe. Bloomberg’s Ayai Tomisawa…

AbbVie Joins Over 400 Leading US Employers in the Human Rights Campaign’s ‘Business Coalition for the Equality Act’

Originally published on LinkedIn. AbbVie ranked No. 19 on The DiversityInc Top 50 Companies for Diversity list in 2020.   AbbVie has joined a group of over 400 corporations and leading U.S. employers to support the Human Rights Campaign’s “Business Coalition for the Equality Act,” an initiative advocating for federal…

Accenture and Goodwill Develop Virtual Experience To Help People Impacted by the Criminal Justice System Enter the Workforce

Originally published at prnewswire.com. Accenture is ranked No. 5 on The DiversityInc Top 50 Companies for Diversity list in 2020.   Goodwill Industries International has teamed with Accenture to develop an innovative virtual experience called Project Overcome. The experience is designed for people impacted by the criminal justice system who want to…