Supreme Court Allows Trump's 'Muslim Ban 3.0' to Go into Effect

President Donald Trump kicked off the holiday season byretweeting racist, anti-Muslim videoson Wednesday, which garnered the praise ofDavid Duke, former grand wizard of the Ku Klux Klan. Trump’s sentiment continued on Monday through the Supreme Court, whichcosigned on his travel ban thattargets people from six Muslim-majority countries.

The court, except for two dissenting justices Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Sonia Sotomayor granted his administration’s request to lift two injunctions imposed by lower courts that partially blocked the ban.

It’s the third version of a controversial policy that Trump first sought to implement a week after taking office in January. The ban is beingreferred to as “Muslim Ban 3.0”by organizations such as the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) and the Council on American Islamic Relations (CAIR).

The court’s ruling means Muslim Ban 3.0 can be enforced while it is being litigated. It is a win for the Trump administration, making good on his campaign promises to his anti-Muslim, anti-immigrant supporters. But it’s only a temporary victory. The court could still find the ban unconstitutional at a later date.

The ban will now go fully into effect for people from Chad, Iran, Libya, Somalia, Syria and Yemen seeking to enter the United States.

North Korea and Venezuela have travel restrictions as well. However, in September, an administration official acknowledged that the number of North Koreans now traveling to the U.S. was very low, according toReuters. Restrictions on Venezuela apply to that country’s leaders and their families.

Lower courts had said people from the banned nations “with a claim of a ‘bona fide’ relationship with someone in the United States could not be kept out of the country,” according to TIME magazine. “Grandparents, cousins and other relatives were among those courts said could not be excluded.”

The ACLU, which has been fighting the travel ban in the lower courts, condemned the decision in a tweet using the hashtag#NoMuslimBanEver:

The organization is alsocirculating a petitionto “immediately pass legislation to rescind the illegal and unconstitutional Muslim ban.”

Craig Considine, a lecturer at Rice University, is the author of several books on Muslims in the West.

Considine tweeted that white supremacy is fueling the travel ban:

Considinetold The New York Timeslast week that Trump re-tweeting the inflammatory anti-Muslim videos wasan attempt to promote intolerance of Muslims in Western countries and build a case for forcing them out.

“He’s playing on this fear, whipping up the fear,” Considine said. “It is completely reckless.”

White House spokesman Hogan Gidley said Monday that the Supreme Court’s decision was not surprising.

“We are not surprised by today’s Supreme Court decision permitting immediate enforcement of the president’s proclamation limiting travel from countries presenting heightened risks of terrorism,” Gidley said in a statement.

“The proclamation is lawful and essential to protecting our homeland. We look forward to presenting a fuller defense of the proclamation as the pending cases work their way through the courts.”

CAIR was established in 1994 to challenge stereotypes of Islam and Muslims. The majority of its work deals with civil rights and anti-defamation.

Lena Masri, the organization’s national litigation director, said human consequences weren’t considered in the Supreme Court’s decision.

“This decision ignores the very real human consequences to American citizens and their families abroad imposed by President Trump’s Muslim Ban 3.0,” Masri said.

Read more news @

Latest News