Novartis Study: SEG101 Antibody Reduces Frequency of Sickle Cell Pain

Results from the Phase II SUSTAIN study show that SEG101 (crizanlizumab, formerly SelG1), an anti-P-selectin antibody, reduced the median annual rate of sickle cell-related pain crises (SCPC) by 45.3 percent compared to placebo (1.63 vs 2.98, p=0.010) in patients with or without hydroxyurea therapy1.


Novartis (No. 2 on the Fair360, formerly DiversityInc Top 50 Companies list) announced that the data was featured in the official press briefing at the 58thAmerican Society of Hematology (ASH) Annual Meeting and presented during the Plenary Scientific Session. The results also are being published simultaneously in The New England Journal of Medicine.

“Acute painful episodes,commonly referred to asvaso-occlusive crises, are a substantial cause of morbidity in sickle cell disease with limited treatment options,” said Kenneth I. Ataga, M.D., Division of Hematology/Oncology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill. “These findings show that crizanlizumab significantly reduces the frequency ofpainful crisesand represents a potentially novel disease-modifying therapeutic option.”

In the SUSTAIN study, patients were assigned to high-dose (5.0 mg/kg), low-dose (2.5 mg/kg) and placebo arms. The study met its primary endpoint, reduction of the annual rate of SCPC in the high-dose arm by 45.3% vs. placebo (medians of 1.63 vs. 2.98, p=0.010). In the low- dose arm, the annual rate of SCPC was reduced by 32.6 percent vs. placebo (medians of 2.01 vs. 3.0, p = 0.180). For patients in the high-dose arm, time to first SCPC vs. placebo was 2.9 times longer (medians of 4.07 vs. 1.38 months, p = 0.001) and time to second SCPC was 2.0 times longer than placebo (medians of 10.32 vs. 5.09 months, p = 0.022)1.

“Patients have long been in need of a new therapy for treatment of SCPC, the most common and debilitating complication of sickle cell disease,” said Bruno Strigini, CEO of Novartis Oncology. “We are pleased that data from the SUSTAIN study show SEG101 may have the potential to become the first new option for patients dealing with SCPC since hydroxyurea was approved for use in sickle cell anemia about 20 years ago2.”

Despite its availability, hydroxyurea often is not utilized primarily due to concerns about patient compliance and potential adverse events3,4.

About the SUSTAIN trial

The SUSTAIN trial was a multicenter, multinational, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, 12-month study to assess safety and efficacy of the anti-P-selectin antibody SEG101 with or without hydroxyurea therapy in sickle cell disease patients with sickle cell-related pain crises. Patients included in the study had a history of 2 to 10 pain crises in the previous 12 months. Patients receiving hydroxyurea or erythropoietin were included if prescribed for the preceding 6 months and dose was stable for at least 3 months. The trial randomized 198 patients age 16 to 65 to receive high-dose SEG101, low-dose SEG101 or placebo1.

Adverse events that occurred in 5% or more of patients in an active dose group and were elevated over placebo by at least 2-fold were arthralgia, pruritus, vomiting, chest pain, diarrhea, road traffic accident, fatigue, myalgia, musculoskeletal chest pain, abdominal pain, influenza and oropharyngeal pain. There were no apparent increases in infections with SEG101 treatment. Five deaths occurred during the study, 2 at 5.0 mg/kg, 1 at 2.5 mg/kg and 2 in placebo; no deaths were deemed related to the study drug1.

About SEG101 (crizanlizumab)

SEG101 (crizanlizumab, formerly SelG1) is a humanized anti-P-selectin monoclonal antibody that binds a molecule called P-selectin on the surface of endothelial cells and platelets in the blood vessels, causing a blockade of P-selectin1,5. P-selectin drives the vaso-occlusive process1,6. Vaso-occlusive crises, also known as SCPC, occur episodically when sickle-shaped red blood cells block blood flow through blood vessels7. The therapeutic blockade of P-selectin can prevent painful vaso-occlusion in small blood vessels and maintain blood flow1,7.

For more information, please visithttp://www.novartis.com.

Sign up to follow @Novartis on Twitter at http://twitter.com/novartis and @NovartisCancer athttp://twitter.com/novartiscancer.

References

1. Ataga KI, et al. SUSTAIN: A Multicenter, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Double-Blind, 12-Month Study to Assess Safety and Efficacy of SelG1 with or without Hydroxyurea Therapy in Sickle Cell Disease Patients with Sickle Cell-Related Pain Crises. Abstract #1. 2016 58th American Society of Hematology (ASH) Annual Meeting,San Diego, California.

2. Segal JB, Strouse JJ, et al. Evidence Reports/Technology Assessments, No. 165. Rockville, MD:Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2008 Feb.

3. Zumberg MS, Reddy S, et al. Hydroxyurea therapy for sickle cell disease in community-based practices: a survey of Florida and North Carolina hematologists/oncologists. Am J Hematol. 2005 Jun;79(2):107113.

4. Miller ST, Kim HY, et al. for Sickle Cell Disease Clinical Research Network (SCDCRN). Inpatient management of sickle cell pain: A ‘snapshot’ of current practice. Am J Hematol. 2012 Mar;87(3):333336.

5. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation. Data on file. 2016.

6. Manwani D. Frenette PS. Vaso-occlusion in sickle cell disease: pathophysiology and novel targeted therapies. Blood.2013; 122(24):3892-3898.

7. Quinn CT. Anti-adhesive therapy for sickle cell disease. The Hematologist. 2014;11(6):15.

Related

Trending Now

Follow us

Most Popular