N.C. Republicans Seek to Ban Gay Marriage

Still reeling on the backlash from its discriminatory “bathroom bill,” North Carolina is back with yet another attack on the LGBT community.

Reps. Larry Pittman, Michael Speciale, and Carl Ford, all Republicans, on Tuesday filed House Bill 780, or the “Uphold Historical Marriage Act,” that would not only ban gay marriage in the state of North Carolina but would also not recognize existing marriage — no matter what state they were conducted in.

According to the bill, the Supreme Court “overstepped its constitutional bounds” in its landmark Obergefell v. Hodges decision in 2015, which legalized gay marriage nationwide.

The Obergefell v. Hodges ruling “exceeds the authority of the Court relative to the decree of Almighty God that ‘a man shall leave his father and his mother and hold fast to his wife, and they shall become one flesh’ (Genesis 2:24, ESV) and abrogates the clear meaning and understanding of marriage in all societies throughout prior history,” according to the bill.

If passed, the bill would bring back into effect the state constitution’s Article XIV, Section 6 Marriage Amendment of 2012, which only recognizes marriage as being between a man and a woman. HB 780 notes that this amendment was passed with a 61 percent affirmative vote.

Democratic Gov. Roy Cooper called the bill “wrong,” adding, “We need more LGBT protections, not fewer.”

Wake County Commissioner John Burns called two of the bill’s sponsors “special embarrassments.”

The American Civil Liberties Union released a statement against the bill.

“Marriage equality is the law of the land in North Carolina and the entire nation, no matter what half-baked legal theories anti-LGBT lawmakers try to put forward,” said ACLU-NC Policy Director Sarah Gillooly. “This bill is absurd, unconstitutional and further proof that some North Carolina legislators remain committed to discriminating against LGBT people and their families. North Carolina lawmakers cannot defy the U.S. Supreme Court based on their extreme personal views.”

The North Carolina Democratic Party also criticized the Republican’s efforts at discrimination.

“Republicans in the General Assembly seem to have a special talent for embarrassing themselves and our state,” the group said. “Instead of wasting their time on hateful, discriminatory and clearly unconstitutional legislation, they should be working with Governor Cooper to improve our schools and cut taxes for the middle class.”

Greg Wallace, a Campbell University law professor, said if the bill went into effect “it would be declared unconstitutional.”

“While people legitimately can disagree with the Supreme Court’s gay marriage decision a state legislature cannot overrule the Supreme Court’s interpretation of the federal constitution,” Wallace said.

Separation of Church and State

A common argument for laws that invoke religion, as HB 780 would if placed into effect, is that the widely used phrase “separation of Church and State” does not explicitly appear in the U.S. Constitution. But, according to Cornell University Law School, “The First Amendment’s Establishment Clause prohibits the government from making any law ‘respecting an establishment of religion.’ This clause not only forbids the government from establishing an official religion, but also prohibits government actions that unduly favor one religion over another.”

And to invalidate the separation of Church and State because the Constitution does not feature this exact wording is also a flawed argument because the Supreme Court serves to interpret the Constitution — meaning that if something is not exactly stated, it is up to the justices to determine what the Constitution means.

The Huffington Post explains:

“First and most basic is the fact that the Supreme Court is the ultimate interpreter of federal constitutional law. This means that while the term ‘separation of Church and State’ may never appear in the constitution itself, the Court ruling in the case of Everson v. Board of Education stated ‘the clause against establishment of religion by law was intended to erect ‘a wall of separation between Church and State.””

Everson v. Board of Education was a Supreme Court case that was decided in 1947. A taxpayer in New Jersey sued because a tax funded school district offered reimbursements for students who took public transportation to school, including those going to private religious schools. The reasoning was that this in effect was the state supporting religion, which is prohibited by the Constitution. The court ultimately ruled that the district was not in violation of the Constitution. However, in both the majority opinion and one of the dissents (in which all opposing judges signed on), the judges made an interpretation of the Establishment Clause. This decision became a precedent for cases to come.

According to the majority opinion, written by Justice Hugo Black:

“The ‘establishment of religion’ clause of the First Amendment means at least this: neither a state nor the Federal Government can set up a church. Neither can pass laws which aid one religion, aid all religions, or prefer one religion over another. Neither can force nor influence a person to go to or to remain away from church against his will or force him to profess a belief or disbelief in any religion.”

And, per Justice Wiley Rutledge’s dissenting opinion:

“The matter is not one of quantity, to be measured by the amount of money expended. Now, as in Madison’s day, it is one of principle, to keep separate the separate spheres as the First Amendment drew them, to prevent the first experiment upon our liberties, and to keep the question from becoming entangled in corrosive precedents. We should not be less strict to keep strong and untarnished the one side of the shield of religious freedom than we have been of the other.”

Read more news @

Latest News

women in politics

Women Remain Vastly Underrepresented in Local Government, Despite Conventional Wisdom Suggesting Otherwise

Vice President Kamala Harris and Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi sat behind President Biden during his first speech to a joint session of Congress on April 28 — representing the first time two women held such important and high-ranking political offices. Even after such a historic moment, the reality…

voter restriction

Florida Follows Georgia’s Lead, Approves Racist Anti-Voter Restrictions Aimed Primarily at Democrats and People of Color

Not content with letting Georgia be the only state in the South demonized for its bigoted and racist attacks on voter rights, Florida has jumped into the fray in issuing its own series of new and highly controversial “Jim Crow-esque” anti-voting restrictions aimed specifically at disenfranchising Democrats and voters of…

Kentucky Derby

Inspired by Protests Over Breonna Taylor’s Death, Humana and Kentucky Derby Festival Launch Diversity and Inclusion Initiative in Louisville

Ahead of the 147th Kentucky Derby on Saturday, May 1, Kentucky Derby officials and Humana (No. 25 on The DiversityInc Top 50 Companies for Diversity list in 2020) have announced a new equity initiative meant to make the race more accessible and welcoming to everyone, regardless of race, gender, age…

crimes against human ity

‘Crime Against Humanity’; Global Report Says the US Should Be Prosecuted in International Criminal Court for Ongoing Police Murders of Black Americans

In what has been described as a “devastating” report, human rights experts and lawyers have investigated and released a 188-page analysis of the ongoing police brutality and killing of Black Americans in the U.S. Their verdict: the country is guilty of “crimes against humanity” and should be prosecuted for its…

Tokyo, Olympics

Tokyo Olympics to Encourage Significant Increase in Gender Equality Among Event’s Corporate Sponsors

Besides simply being a showcase for some of the most talented and athletic men and women on the planet, the organizers of the Tokyo Olympics are hoping their event this summer can also help promote significant change in corporate culture, both in Japan and around the globe. Bloomberg’s Ayai Tomisawa…

AbbVie Joins Over 400 Leading US Employers in the Human Rights Campaign’s ‘Business Coalition for the Equality Act’

Originally published on LinkedIn. AbbVie ranked No. 19 on The DiversityInc Top 50 Companies for Diversity list in 2020.   AbbVie has joined a group of over 400 corporations and leading U.S. employers to support the Human Rights Campaign’s “Business Coalition for the Equality Act,” an initiative advocating for federal…

Accenture and Goodwill Develop Virtual Experience To Help People Impacted by the Criminal Justice System Enter the Workforce

Originally published at Accenture is ranked No. 5 on The DiversityInc Top 50 Companies for Diversity list in 2020.   Goodwill Industries International has teamed with Accenture to develop an innovative virtual experience called Project Overcome. The experience is designed for people impacted by the criminal justice system who want to…