orientation, court, gender
In a landmark decision, the Supreme Court declared that Title VII of the Civil RIghts Act of 1964 protects gay and transgender individuals from job discrimination. The decision is a heartening victory coming from a majority conservative court for the LGBTQ+ community. (Photo: Rena Schild/Shutterstock.com)

In Landmark Case, Supreme Court Declares Federal Law Protects LGBTQ+ Individuals From Job Discrimination

On Monday morning, the Supreme Court ruled that existing federal law forbids job discrimination based on sexual orientation or gender identity. The ruling is a landmark victory for the LGBTQ+ community, and a surprising decision coming from a majority conservative court.

In a 6–3 vote, the Court ruled that Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 inherently makes it illegal for employers to discriminate against workers because of their gender or sexual orientation. The language of Title VII explicitly mentions “sex” as a protected category. The question was whether the wording could be correctly interpreted to expand beyond the definition of biological sex to cover sexual orientation and gender identity as well. Upholding rulings from lower courts, the Court decided that sexual orientation and gender identity discrimination are forms of sex discrimination.

Neil Gorsuch wrote the decision — a surprising move considering he was President Trump’s first Supreme Court appointee. Conservative Chief Justice John Roberts joined him, along with the Court’s four liberal justices, Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Sonia Sotomayor, Elena Kagan and Stephen G. Breyer. Justices Brett Kavanaugh, Samuel A. Alito and Clarence Thomas dissented.

“An employer who fired an individual for being homosexual or transgender fires that person for traits or actions it would not have questioned in members of a different sex,” the decision says. “Sex plays a necessary and undisguisable role in the decision, exactly what Title VII forbids.”

A large debate in the midst of this argument had to do with the intentions of lawmakers in 1964. In August, the Department of Justice (DOJ) filed a Supreme Court brief that advised the justices to rule against Title VII applying to LGBTQ+ people. The DOJ argued that in 1964, the understanding of sexuality and gender identity was not mainstream, and therefore the law could only be applied to people who are cisgender.

Related Story: DOJ Files Brief Asking the Supreme Court to Rule Against Protecting Transgender Individuals from Workplace Discrimination Under Title VII

However, Gorsuch wrote in the decision, “Those who adopted the Civil Rights Act might not have anticipated their work would lead to this particular result, but the limits of the drafters’ imagination supply no reason to ignore the law’s demands.”

He went on to assert that only the written word is the law — not implications surrounding it.

Across the country, 21 states have their own laws prohibiting discrimination against LGBTQ+ individuals, but this decision prevents this kind of discrimination across the board.

This decision is a victory for Gerald Bodstock, who was fired from a job as a welfare services coordinator for Clayton County, Georgia after joining a gay softball team. It’s also a victory for the relatives of the late Donald Zarda, a skydiving instructor who was fired after he told a female client not to feel uncomfortable that they were strapped together because he was gay.

The Court conceded that sexual orientation was not on lawmakers’ minds in 1964 when Title VII was passed, but that if an employee would fire a male worker for dating males and not a female worker for dating males, then the employer’s action applies directly to sex.

Aimee Stephens, who also died in May before her case reached the Supreme Court, was a transgender woman who was fired from her job at a funeral home because she refused to wear the men’s uniform.

Related Story: Zarda v. Altitude Express: Supreme Court to Hear First of Three Cases Regarding LGBTQ Discrimination

While the DOJ’s brief tried to convince the Court that Stephens’ identity was not protected by Title VII, the ACLU argued that if Stephens was assigned female at birth, she would not have requested to wear a different uniform, hence making sex relevant in cases of transgender discrimination. The Court’s view aligned with that of the ACLU.

The Supreme Court victory for LGBTQ+ individuals comes just days after the Trump administration rolled back an Obama-era policy that protected LGBTQ+ healthcare patients from discrimination. Trump announced this decision on the anniversary of the 2016 Pulse nightclub shooting, in the wake of the coronavirus sweeping the nation and as protests against police brutality against the Black community raged.

In light of the state of the country, many LGBTQ+ organizations are applauding the decision, but reminding the public that more work needs to be done to protect LGBTQ+ people of all races, socioeconomic statuses and abilities.

“These decisions impact areas of the law where Congress has prohibited sex discrimination, but there are too many places in law that lack these protections,” the Human Rights Campaign said in a statement. “The Senate should join the House and move immediately to pass the Equality Act—which would codify protections for LGBTQ people in employment, housing, credit, education and jury service as well as add much-needed protections for sex, sexual orientation and gender identity in public spaces and services, as well as federally-funded programs.”

 

Latest News

Syracuse University campus

News Roundup: TV Diversity, Syracuse Hire, and Segregated Training

Check out our news roundup of diversity and inclusion updates and insights from across the U.S.: Syracuse University Creates Athletics Diversity Position  While most colleges and universities around the county are making COVID-19-related cuts in regard to their athletic departments, Syracuse University has hired Salatha T. Willis as the associate athletic…

What Friends Tell Friends: Choose Kaiser Permanente

Originally published on about.kaiserpermanente.org. Integrated, nonprofit health plan tops NICE Satmetrix customer experience benchmark study for 10th straight year. For the 10th year in a row, more people would recommend Kaiser Permanente to a friend or colleague than any other health plan in the nation, according to the recently released…

Mastercard Expands ShopOpenings.com to the U.S. & Canada, Delivering a Search Tool That Identifies What Stores Near You Are Open for Business

Originally published on mastercardcontentexchange.com. Search solution complements new Digital Acceleration for Small Business global initiative which helps small businesses advance digitally and drive online commerce As businesses seek to draw customers back both in store and online, Mastercard is introducing new tools to support them. Today, Mastercard announced the geographic…

TIAA Launches Programs to Raise Awareness of Racial Injustice and Support Communities in Need through the “Be The Change” Initiative

On June 30, TIAA announced new virtual programs designed to raise awareness of racial injustice and support communities in need as a part of the company’s recently launched “Be the Change” initiative. One is TIAA’s “Race Against Racism,” an effort in support of The Innocence Project which included more than…

Stop TB Partnership and Johnson & Johnson, with support from USAID and The Global Fund, Announce Price Reduction for SIRTURO® (bedaquiline) for Treatment of Drug-Resistant Tuberculosis in Low- and Middle-Income Countries

Originally published on jnj.com. Joint efforts aim to accelerate scale-up of WHO-recommended all-oral treatment regimens – a transition urgently needed to help protect the health of people with drug resistant-tuberculosis who are particularly vulnerable during COVID-19 pandemic In 2020, the initiative aims to reach at least 125,000 patients and could…

Toyota, Alabama A&M and Huntsville Hospital Collaborate to Make COVID-19 Testing Easier

Originally published on pressroom.toyota.com. $100,000 grant provides free service to the community Alabama A & M University (AAMU), Huntsville Hospital and Toyota are developing a mobile health clinic initiative to provide free COVID-19 testing to underserved communities in Madison County. Launching later this year, the mobile medical clinic program has…

Sanofi and Regeneron Provide Update on Kevzara® (sarilumab) Phase 3 U.S. Trial in COVID-19 Patients

Originally published on sanofi.com. Sanofi and Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (NASDAQ: REGN) today announced that the U.S. Phase 3 trial of Kevzara® (sarilumab) 400 mg in COVID-19 patients requiring mechanical ventilation did not meet its primary and key secondary endpoints when Kevzara was added to best supportive care compared to best supportive care alone (placebo)….