Jason Van Dyke

Illinois Supreme Court Upholds Jason Van Dyke’s Lenient Prison Sentence

Jason Van Dyke’s prison sentence for the murder of Laquan McDonald will not be overturned. In a 4-2 vote, the Illinois Supreme Court decided Tuesday that it would uphold Van Dyke’s original sentence of less than seven years for the cold-blooded killing of the Chicago teen.

Van Dyke faced 20 years in prison for second-degree murder and up to 30 years for each of 16 counts of aggravated battery — one count for each shot he fired at McDonald.

Illinois Attorney General Kwame Raoul and the special prosecutor who won a murder conviction against former officer Jason Van Dyke, Kane County State’s Attorney Joseph McMahon filed the Writ of Mandamus because they felt Cook County Judge Vincent Gaughan hadn’t properly applied the law when issuing his lenient prison sentence.

The writ, if it had been approved, would have forced Judge Gaughan to impose a tougher sentence on the defendant.

Although the six-year and nine month sentence for the former cop was the first imposed on a Chicago police officer for an on-duty shooting in fifty years, the fact that he was convicted of murder and not manslaughter matters. Second-degree murder is the intent to commit murder with malice aforethought. Van Dyke didn’t go into the situation with the intent or plan to kill McDonald so it wasn’t premeditated.

The high court didn’t give an explanation regarding its refusal to hear the case. But it stands to reason that the disregard for McDonald’s life could be politically connected. The majority vote came from the court’s three Republicans — Robert Thomas, Rita Garman and Chief Justice Lloyd Karmeier and then adding, Anne Burke, a Democrat who is married to Chicago Alderman Edward Burke, a former Chicago police officer who is facing federal corruption charges.

The two justices who voted in favor of the motion discussed their views.

Justice P. Scott Neville Jr. wrote, specifically, that the court opinion on which Gaughan used as his guide to sentence Van Dyke was “the opposite” of the prevailing state law.

“The trial court’s actions here were clearly improper as a matter of law,” wrote Justice Thomas Kilbride.

“We recognize and respect the supreme court’s authority,” Raoul said in an afternoon news conference.

Prosecutors Raoul and McMahon may have exhausted all of their options and although they respect the Illinois Supreme Court’s decision, the two men are keenly aware that Jason Van Dyke did not get the punishment he deserved for murdering Laquan McDonald.

Latest News

Questlove plays a DJ set at DiversityInc's 2022 Top 50 event.

Photo Gallery: 2022 Top 50 Event

Accenture earns No. 1 spot on the Top 50 List, Hilton joins Hall of Fame. Expert panels and presentations cover the event’s theme of “ESG: Climate and Culture at Risk”. State Street execs share how they ranked for the first time. Cutting edge research from the Wharton School is presented…

Dr. Sally Saba

DiversityInc 2022 Top 50 Event: A New Landscape = New Opportunity: Shaping Corporate Standards of Excellence for ID&E Management

The role of an inclusion, diversity and equity practitioner has completely evolved, and all eyes are on the corporate community as it navigates its approach. Dr. Sally Saba, Chief Inclusion and Diversity Officer at Medtronic, spoke about working together to shape the next generation’s standards during her Top50Talk “A New…

5 Biggest News Stories of the Week: May 5

As the saying goes, the news never stops — but there’s a lot of it out there, and all of it doesn’t always pertain to our readers. In this weekly news roundup, we’ll cover the top news stories that matter most to our diversity focused audience. 1. The Impact Overturning…