Subscribe to DiversityInc today!

Corporate Options
Newsletter Sign Up
Log In
DiversityInc Magazine | Advertise | Special Sections | Resource Guide | Foundation | Webinars | Benchmarking | DiversityInc Careers
Site Sponsors
Marriott
Home Depot
Bank of America
Cox Communications
Well Point
KPMG
Verizon
Aetna
Wachovia
PWC
Deloitte
ibm




You are here: DiversityInc | Diversity News Free | Mass. Gov. Romney Wa . . .
Mass. Gov. Romney Wants Courts to Force Vote on Gay Marriage
By The Associated Press

Digg digg this | Mixx! mixx! | reddit | del.icio.us | Seed_NewsvineNewsvine | Google_Bookmark | Yahoo_Bookmark
 e-mail article | print print | post comments | NEWSLETTER
©DiversityInc. Reproduction in any format is absolutely prohibited.

November 20, 2006

Gov. Mitt Romney said Sunday he would ask the state's highest court to order an anti-gay-marriage amendment question onto the ballot if legislators fail to vote on the matter when they reconvene in January.

Romney said he would file a legal action this week asking a justice of the Supreme Judicial Court to direct the secretary of state to place the question on the ballot if lawmakers don't vote directly on the question on Jan. 2, the final day of the session.

Romney, an opponent of gay marriage who decided not to seek re-election as he considers running for president, made his announcement to the cheers of hundreds of gay-marriage opponents at a rally on the Statehouse steps.

"The constitution quite plainly states that when a qualified petition is placed before them, the Legislature 'shall vote.' It does not say 'may vote,' or vote if procedures permit a vote, or vote if there are enough of the members in the chamber. It says, 'shall vote."' Romney said.

People in favor of gay marriage staged a protest across the street.

DiversityInc Bookstore

Making Gay History -- The Half Century Fight for Lesbian and Gay Equal Rights

From the Boy Scouts and the U.S. military to marriage and adoption, the gay rights movement has exploded on the national stage. Eric Marcus takes us back in time to the earliest days of that struggle. Using the heart-felt stories of more than 60 people, he carries us through the compelling five-decade battle that has changed the fabric of American society.

For More Information

The Supreme Judicial Court ruled in November 2003 that such marriages were legal. Since then, more than 8,000 same-sex couples have tied the knot in the state.

More than 170,000 people had signed a petition in support of the ballot question, which would define marriage as between only a man and a woman.

Romney has criticized lawmakers since they voted 109-87 earlier this month refusing to take up the question during a joint session, voting instead to recess until Jan. 2 and all but killing the measure.

"The issue now before us is not whether same-sex couples should marry," Romney said. "The issue before us today is whether 109 legislators will follow the constitution."

Supporters of gay marriage defended the Nov. 9 procedural move.

"One of the tenets of the Constitution is that you do not put the rights of a minority up for a popularity contest," said Mark Solomon, campaign director of Mass Equality, a pro-gay marriage group. "It is one of the very principles this country was founded upon."

Solomon criticized Romney for holding a one-sided political event on Statehouse property.

"Gov. Romney is trying to divide Massachusetts and use this issue as a device to run for president," Solomon said.

Romney spokesperson Eric Fehrnstrom said the governor conferred with the state Ethics Commission before staging the event in front of giant American flag hung from the Statehouse balcony while a sound system played John Philip Sousa's "Stars and Stripes Forever."

"This is a democracy rally, and the governor is trying to see that some lawmakers play their legislative role," Fehrnstrom said.

Because the Legislature is in recess and did not adjourn, Romney has no legal authority to call lawmakers back into session.

Spokespeople for Senate President Robert Travaglini and House Speaker Salvatore DiMasi did not immediately return a call Sunday.

The Legislature grappled with various efforts to ban same-sex marriages even before the high court ruling in 2003. Lawmakers refused to vote on a citizens' initiative in 2002, and two years later voted down their own proposed amendment that would have banned gay marriage and legalized civil unions.

In the November elections, amendments to ban gay marriage passed in Colorado, Idaho, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Virginia and Wisconsin. Only Arizona defeated such an amendment.

Vermont and Connecticut have legalized civil unions that give same-sex couples benefits similar to marriage. New Jersey's highest court has ordered the Legislature to allow either marriage or civil unions for same-sex couples. (AP)

DiversityInc Bookstore

By George Chauncey

Why Marriage?
The History Shaping Today's Debate Over Gay Equality

Why has marriage emerged as the most explosive issue in the gay struggle for equality?

The author shows the shifting attitudes toward gays, from the growth in acceptance to the many campaigns against gay rights that led to today's demand for a constitutional amendment. What's at stake for both sides is illuminated.

For More Information

 
More from Today's Diversity News
<< PREVIOUS ITEM | NEXT ITEM >>

 




Digg digg this | Mixx! mixx! | reddit | del.icio.us | Seed_NewsvineNewsvine | Google_Bookmark | Yahoo_Bookmark
 e-mail article | print print | post comments | NEWSLETTER

Send Your Comments About This Article Now

First Name:

Last Name:
Your E-Mail Address
Message Subject
Message:

Clicking "Send Message" registers your e-mail address to
receive DiversityInc's Free Daily Newsletter.


©DiversityInc. Reproduction in any format is absolutely prohibited.

Diversity News
Remembering Those Who Died in Service to Our Country

And the Winners Are … First Spaniard Oscar Winner, LGBT Documentary

The Top 25 Best Black Films of All Time? Did TIME Get It Right?

How Can You Curb Teen Violence? Mentoring


click here to ask a question | click here to read recent Q & A
Most Popular Articles on DiversityInc
Obama Wouldn't Be First Black President

A Boomer's Lament: Earbuds, Texting & Toilet Seats

5 Ways Diversity Can Save Your Job

Behind Closed Doors: What the Victim of Workplace Bullying Brings Home

DiversityInc Top 50 Dinner Announcement

Daily News Picks
Barack and Michelle: Relationship Role Models?
HIV Could Disappear in a Decade, Study Says
California Is Route of Choice for Undocumented Immigrants
Burress to Plead Not Guilty to Weapons Charges
More Popular Articles on DiversityInc
Catholic Cardinal James Stafford Is Wrong About Obama

Remember Your Other 5 Black Presidents

Things NEVER to Say to American Indian Coworkers

Tips for the 50-and-Older Job Seeker: Staying Plugged In

Do Blacks Need to Relax Their Natural Hair to Get Promoted?

Who Is Michelle Obama?

Is Obama Victory for Blacks or for Everyone?

Discrimination Law You Need to Know

Oprah Is Boycotted After Refusing Palin Interview

Buying Power of American Indians Grows With Little Impact on Overall Economy

Why Whites Can't 'Get Over' Color

Women We Love: 8 Stories of Personal Triumph and Positive Impact

'Down Home With the Neelys'

Obama's Victory: Headlines From Around the Nation

Their Reflection: Obama's Win Inspires Young Black America

Diversity 101: Five Short Topics You Can Present

How to Use Diversity to Reach Customers

In Some Ways, American Indians Are Losing Their Identity

Join Now! | Log In | Contact Us | Post Jobs | Magazine | Advertise | About Us | Privacy Policy | Site Map
Legal | Research & Reference | Financial Literacy | Video Network | Foundation | Webinars
Thanks for visiting
DiversityInc.com!
To continue viewing free articles on our site and in our newsletter, please enter your e-mail address in the box.
E-mail

Welcome to DiversityInc Careers
Join Now to Avoid Pop-Ups. Save 50%!
Choose a Premium Subscription Here.

FREE Memberships
We never reveal, share or sell member information. For complete details, see our Privacy Statement.