"An employer should feel honored
that an employee is willing to share this kind of information," says Dagit. "It
is indicative of their trust and their connection and allegiance with the
organization. It shouldn't be discouraged."
Dagit, who has osteogenesis
imperfecta, believes an employee is more likely to be upfront about a medical
problem if the corporation has created an atmosphere of openness--as GM did for
Flores.
"Employers need to let employees
know that they really want to accommodate people," Dagit says. "And they need to
know that with most disabilities, the more that you are able to accommodate a
person's desire to work flexibly, the more likely they'll get well and get back
to work faster."
Knowing there are legal
protections that prevent employers from arbitrarily firing an employee because
of an illness or medical condition can help employees feel more secure in
disclosing medical problems.
An employee may not have to fully
disclose a disability or illness, but he or she may want to talk with the
human-resources department to request a reasonable accommodation to continue to
perform the job satisfactorily.
Dagit advises employees that the
direct approach is best. "What is important for the employee to do is try not to
talk through their physicians or any other outside third
party," Dagit says. "Have a
conversation with a manager or the HR person to explain the situation. Propose
what they think is the best solution and come up with something that makes sense
for them on a personal level and for the business."
There are legal protections for
employees diagnosed with illnesses and/or disabilities. The Americans with
Disabilities Act (ADA) provides protection from discriminatory practices for
people who work for companies or organizations with 15 or more employees. The
ADA requires employers to provide
reasonable accommodations to employees or potential employees with disabilities,
as long as the accommodation does not create a significant financial burden. The Family and Medical Leave Act allows a worker undergoing
treatment or caring for a loved one up to 12 weeks of
leave.
Often, collaborations between
employee and employer can yield the best solution.
First, both sides need to consider
the tasks associated with the employee's job, the functional limitations of the
individual and whether the proposed accommodation(s) will result in undue
hardship to the employer.
Solutions may involve equipment
changes, workstation modifications, adjustments to work schedules, assistance in
accessing the facility and dozens of other possibilities, depending on the
individual's particular limitations and needs.
For Flores, part of that solution was
preparing his division for his medical leave so his coworkers would not be
caught by surprise.
"Because of the loyalty the
company showed me, I wanted to show that loyalty back to them in terms of trying
to prepare our department as much as possible for what would likely happen in
the future," he says.
The
Downside
But what happens when an employer
is not accommodating?
If an employer fails to comply
with the ADA, an employee may seek legal
action, forcing a company to comply or to pay damages. The
ADA also prohibits any attempt to
coerce or to retaliate against an employee for asserting their legal
rights.
The Equal Employment Opportunity
Commission (EEOC) encourages employees to follow standard company protocol when
it comes to filing complaints. "If you feel there is a problem with a manager, I
think you first need to follow the formal and informal internal complaint
procedure even if you end up going outside the company," Dagit
says.
Evidence of wrongdoing also is
essential when trying to prove any form of discrimination. Esparza recommends
keeping a detailed record of an individual's job description, daily work
responsibilities and encounters with coworkers.
Not only will a record help
re-allocate time when figuring out how to best modify a work schedule, "it also
helps people track their performance over time. And if there has been a radical
change in the way the relationship proceeds, then maybe it is time to find out
what your rights are," Esparza says.
Although discrimination still
happens, the numbers of complaints filed with the Equal Employment Opportunity
Commission have decreased, according to the EEOC. In the past year,
discrimination complaints in the workplace dropped by 5 percent to 75,428.
Approximately 19 percent of those complaints were
disability-based.
Just as the decision to speak with
an employer about an illness or disability falls on the individual, so does the
decision to speak about it with peers and coworkers. However, an employee should
know that telling a coworker may force the employee to go to management
earlier.
Telling coworkers can lead to the
same feeling of apprehension as telling management. However, being open about an
illness with peers and coworkers can provide an opportunity to better explain a
condition and eliminate the possibility of interoffice gossip. This is
particularly true for illnesses that often are misunderstood or have a negative
stigma attached to them, such as certain forms of cancer and HIV/AIDS. Employees
with HIV/AIDS are not legally obligated to disclose
anything.
Having entered the work force in
the early 1980s with a chronic disability, Dagit never encountered an employer
who has had a problem accommodating her condition.
"I have needed special work
arrangements. I have worked from home for extended periods of time with a fax
machine, speakerphone and have had people come to my home, Federal
Express--whatever it took," Dagit says. "Several years ago, I had serious
problems with my back where I could not get around, so I worked from home for
three months. [Merck was] extremely accommodating in terms of the resources they
provided me to work and allowing me to participate just as I would have had I
been able to come into the office."
Send Your Comments About This Article Now
©DiversityInc. Reproduction in any format is absolutely prohibited.
|