Subscribe to DiversityInc today!
This Web Accessibility icon serves as a link to download
eSSENTIAL Accessibility assistive technology software for individuals with physical disabilities


Corporate Options
Newsletter Sign Up
Log In
DiversityInc Magazine | Special Sections | Vendor Directory | Webinars | Benchmarking | Find a Job | Post a Job
DiversityInc Top 50 | Diversity Management | Affirmative Action | Career Advice | Legal | Diversity Resources | Regional Top Companies for Diversity
Site Sponsors
Deloitte
Marriott
Home Depot
Bank of America
Cox Communications
Well Point
KPMG
Verizon
Aetna
PWC




You are here: DiversityInc | Election 2008 - F | Which Democrat Offen . . .

Which Democrat Offended LGBT Voters? Who Won the Debate?

By Yoji Cole

 e-mail article | print print | post comments | NEWSLETTER

August 10, 2007

Democratic presidential contenders spoke to a national lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender (LGBT) audience for the first time Thursday night in a question-and-answer format organized by the Human Rights Campaign and aired on LOGO, MTV Networks' LGBT network. The Republican candidates all declined to participate in a similar forum.

 

The Democratic contenders faced questions regarding their inability to support marriage rights for same-sex couples, how they would deal with the military's "don't ask, don't tell" policy, the need for hate-crimes legislation to cover LGBT people, and much more.

 

The forum, which was taped in Los Angeles, was attended by all Democratic contenders except for Sens. Joseph Biden and Chris Dodd, who said they had scheduling conflicts.

 

 

For an in-depth analysis of the forum by National Public Radio, click here. To read "The Personal Horror of Don't Ask, Don't Tell," click here.

 

All of the Democratic candidates said they support a federal ban on anti-LGBT job discrimination, want to repeal the "don't ask, don't tell" policy barring gays from serving openly in the military, and support civil unions that would extend marriage-like rights to same-sex couples.

 

In general, the contenders were defensive. Former Sen. John Edwards explained how he wouldn't allow his Christian faith to get in the way of his support of civil unions but admitted he is not willing to support same-sex marriage at this point. Sen. Barack Obama said he doesn't believe same-sex marriage is a civil-rights issue but also explained that he regularly speaks to black ministers about dealing with the community's anti-gay sentiment. However, the night's "groaning" moment came when New Mexico Gov. Bill Richardson answered the question of whether being LGBT is a choice or a biological orientation. He claimed it's a choice.

 

Richardson, who supported domestic-partner and hate-crimes legislation in New Mexico, further explained his point. "I don't see this as an issue of science or definition. I see gays and lesbians as people. I see it as matter of love and companionship. I don't like to categorize people. I don't like to answer questions grounded in science or things I don't understand," Richardson said.

 

The Democratic presidential contenders who did best were Congressman Dennis Kucinich, Sen. Mike Gravel and Sen. Hillary Clinton, who tactfully and earnestly defended her support of civil unions with full marriage rights and promised an end to the policies of the Bush administration, such as the Federal Marriage Amendment.

 

"It was demeaning. It was degrading. It was mean spirited. That will end. That is over," Clinton said to applause.

 

Kucinich and Gravel are distinct from the rest of the pack because they fully support same-sex marriage as opposed to civil unions with full marriage rights.

 

"[Marriage] is a commitment between two humans in love, and if there's anything we need in this world it's more love," said Gravel.

 

Kucinich also said same-sex marriage is about love and added that he supports a not-for-profit healthcare system that would fully cover people with HIV/AIDS.

 

LGBT-rights activists, such as musician Melissa Etheridge, attended the event.

 

While the forum only aired on LOGO, the network is available in 27 million homes. How the contenders were perceived by that television audience, which was undoubtedly largely LGBT and their friends and supporters, could prove to be extremely important in a tight presidential race.

 

LGBT voters are an extremely strong voting bloc, a group comprised of people who are far more likely to vote than the general population, says the Gay & Lesbian Consumer Index. The survey shows that 92.5 percent of gay respondents and 90.7 percent of lesbian respondents report that they voted in the 2004 presidential election. Likewise, in the mid-term election in 2006, 83.8 percent of gays report that they voted, as did 78 percent of lesbians.

 

The percentages greatly outpace those of the straight population. In the 2004 presidential election, 64 percent voted and 40 percent voted in the 2006 mid-term election. 

 

"The general population is made up of lots of groups, and yes, the gay and lesbian population is smaller than the total population," concedes Jerry McHugh, senior director of research for San Francisco-based Community Marketing Inc., which conducted the survey. "But we calculated that 9.8 million gay and lesbian people voted in 2004, and according to the U.S. census, 125 million people voted, so 7.8 percent [of the voters] were gay and lesbian."

 

"That's a significant percentage," he says.

 

 

More Election '08 News>>




 e-mail article | print print | post comments | NEWSLETTER

Send Your Comments About This Article Now

First Name:

Last Name:
Your E-Mail Address
Message Subject
Message:

Clicking "Send Message" registers your e-mail address to
receive DiversityInc's Free Daily Newsletter.


©DiversityInc. Reproduction in any format is absolutely prohibited.


click here to ask a question | click here to read recent Q&A
Click here to follow Luke Visconti on

Click here to view the video below


Click here to view the video below



Click here to view the video below



Click here to view the video below
Most Popular Articles on DiversityInc
Things 'to' Say to LGBT Coworkers

The DiversityInc Top 50 Companies for Diversity®: Where Are They Headquartered?

2009 DiversityInc Top 50 Companies for Diversity®

How Do You Make the Most of an Informational Interview?

Is a White Immigrant From Africa Really an African American?

Press Releases
Wal-Mart Teams with the NALEO Educational Fund to Help Build Healthier America
Procter & Gamble and World Vision Team-Up To Respond To Pakistan Humanitarian Crisis With Clean Drinking Water
Reps. Velázquez, Israel & Serrano Introduce National Hate Crimes Hotline Legislation
600K Summer Jobs: Obama and Biden Announce Roadmap to Recovery

More Popular Articles on DiversityInc
Alpha Kappa Alpha: From Sorority Sisters to Career Coaches

Coming Out … Again

Job Hunting? Ways to Leverage Diversity

LGBT Pride Month: Get the Facts

Obama Won't Be First Black President

10 Things NEVER to Say to a Black Coworker

7 Things NEVER to Say to LGBT Coworkers

Things Never to Say to ANY Coworkers

Internship Do's & Don'ts

Same-Sex Marriage: It's Not About Religion, It's About the Law

The High-School Dropout Crisis: What Are the Solutions?

The DiversityInc Top 10 Companies for LGBT Employees List

The DiversityInc Top 10 Companies for People With Disabilities List

4 Things NEVER to Say to Someone Who Just Lost a Job

Business From a People Perspective
Join Now! | Log In | Contact Us | Post Jobs | Magazine | Advertise/Media Kit | Writer's Guidelines | About Us | Privacy Policy | Site Map
Legal | Research & Reference | Financial Literacy | Foundation | Webinars
Thanks for visiting
DiversityInc.com!
To continue viewing free articles on our site and in our newsletter, please enter your e-mail address in the box.
E-mail

Welcome to DiversityInc Careers
Join Now to Avoid Pop-Ups. Save 50%!
Choose a Premium Subscription Here.

FREE Memberships
We never reveal, share or sell member information. For complete details, see our Privacy Statement.