|
Is There a Double Standard?
By Luke Visconti
May 01, 2007
Question:
I'm curious to get your opinion on
whether the current issues with racist comments from Don Imus and Rush Limbaugh
will spill over into minority programs such as ["Chappelle's Show"] or the "Mind
of Mencia."
Both of these hosts thrive on
racist or bigoted content. Are they allowed to get away with this because they
are minorities or are they somewhat protected because they have the support of
cable networks with deep pockets? Will they ever be held under the same scrutiny
[as] Imus and Rush?
Answer:
I think the kind of
"entertainment" that has thrived by titillating the bigot in all of us has
reached an end point from a financial basis, specifically where commercials must
be sold to support the medium.
"Commercials" are the salient issue.
Almost all cable, broadcast, print media and content-based web sites depend on
advertising for profitability. This is not the case when you buy a book, movie
ticket or music. Your purchase completes the transaction and whatever
profit the manufacturer is going to make has been made.
This is brought
home in the Imus situation. In my opinion, the real factor in getting Imus fired
was that Procter & Gamble, Sprint, American Express and General Motors (all
DiversityInc Top 50 Companies®) pulled their advertising quickly.
These Top 50 companies
already had well-developed bidirectional-communications techniques, which have
not only raised the awareness and perception of top management but enabled
employees to quickly make their feelings known. These major sponsors knew the
right business decision to make because their top management already had
superior diversity management as a standard business practice.
Neither
NBC (nor GE, their parent company) nor CBS are Top 50 companies. Their
flat-footed response spoke of an exposure to potential liabilities.
This
was borne out in CBS's case when another of their radio shows TWICE aired a
racist skit targeting Chinese Americans not long after Imus made his racist
comment. How many times does an advertiser have to be burned by bad decision
making before they go away for good?
Interestingly, two
presidential candidates, Rudy Giuliani and John McCain, came out in support of
Imus. We're going to have an article on diversity in presidential campaign
staffs in the June issue of DiversityInc magazine. The explanation for that
support will be readily apparent.
Consistent and superior management
prevents bad decisions from happening. Diversity management is a critical part
of the mix in today's business environment because our world has changed: White
people are quickly becoming the minority in America; 22 percent of American
families have a biracial component, per capita immigration is at an all time
high for our country, LGBT rights are a prominent national issue, and global
communications and business are driving the global economy.
It bears
noting that Imus was offensive over a long period of time—what you're seeing is
the tipping point. It's starting with commercial media because progressive
companies have proved to be more successful. For example, the Top 50 expressed
as a stock index beats major stock indexes on a long- and short-term
basis.
I think the people behind "Chappelle's Show" and "Mind of Mencia"
should be aware that evolution is critical to survival. I think it is impossible
to financially walk a line on offensive humor in a media that depends on
advertising.
Here's a note for the "get over it" and "free speech" crowd
who have expressed such concern over the recent Imus and Rush controversies: I
don't think you have to worry that the market for racist and/or prurient content
will go away. It won't because we humans are tribal animals and not perfect.
However, I feel this market will be increasingly marginalized because sponsors
won't put up with it. It's not good business.
Send Your Comments About This Article Now
©DiversityInc. Reproduction in any format is absolutely prohibited.
|