|
Lessons Learned After Imus
By Aysha Hussain
April 13, 2007
Now
that the 10-day Don Imus controversy has come to an end, and the
Rutgers
University's
women's basketball team has forgiven him for his remarks, many are wondering who
will replace Imus and who will be next to get the ax? What does this controversy
that has captured the attention of most of the country say about free speech,
our ability to forgive, and the future of other commentators?
The
Imus scandal has triggered a
growing debate about freedom of expression and forgiveness. After
a week of apologies and a face-to-face meeting last night,
Rutgers'
women's basketball coach C. Vivian Stringer said the team
accepts Imus' apology. Stringer said although she still finds Imus' statements
unacceptable, she hopes the incident will help to bring about a change in
society in how we treat one another.
In a
statement today, Stringer said:
"We, the Rutgers University Scarlet Knight basketball team, accept—accept—Mr.
Imus' apology, and we are in the process of forgiving."
| DIVERSITYINC OFFERS FREE SUBSCRIPTIONS |
|
Choose yours below for e-mail addresses ending in:
|
|
Also get DiversityInc free e-newsletter, click here.
|
|
|
|
For nearly
30 years, the
"Imus in the Morning" show was the source of many racist and sexist remarks. Imus is
not the only prominent broadcaster known for his offensive commentary. What
about shock-jock radio host Howard Stern or Bill Maher ("Real Time with Bill
Maher" on HBO)? Or rap
artists such as Snoop Dogg and 50 Cent, whose frequent use of sexist and
racist words such as "bitch" and "ho" go unpunished—should they also be held
accountable?
CBS
President and CEO Leslie Moonves said in a statement yesterday that there is an
even greater lesson that can be learned from Imus' inflammatory comments.
In a memo
to CBS employees, Moonves said firing the morning radio host had more to do with
Imus, according to an article in Forbes.com.
"There has
been much discussion of the effect language like this has on our young people,
particularly young women of color trying to make their way in this society,"
said Moonves. "That consideration has weighed most heavily on our minds as we
made our decision."
Moonves
said Imus flourished in a culture that condones a certain level of objectionable
expression that offends and demeans a wide range of innocent people.
"In taking
him off the air, I believe we take an important and necessary step not just in
solving a unique problem, but in changing that culture, which extends far beyond
the walls of our company," Moonves added.
Since Imus'
fall yesterday, many of his supporters have described his firing as embarrassing
and said Imus' freedom of expression—and the freedom of expression of all
Americans—has been threatened. But anyone can say what he or she wants; it's
only the consequences the speaker has to face.
What are
people saying about this? CNN
contributor Roland Martin views Imus' comments as mostly sexist.
"So many people tried to make this
a race issue. But for me, that wasn't the primary point. I never wavered from
the attack as one of a sexist. It didn't matter that he was trying to be funny.
He insulted a group of women who are already accomplished," Martin
noted.
Even though
Imus made several apologies this week, he still met with each of the 10 members
from Rutgers
University's
women's basketball team for about three hours at N.J. Gov. Jon Corzine's mansion
in Princeton last night. Corzine was seriously injured in a car accident on the
way to the meeting and did not attend. Although Imus left without commenting to
reporters, Stringer spoke briefly on the mansion's steps.
"We had a
very productive meeting," Stringer said. "We were able to really dialogue.
Hopefully, we can put all of this behind us."
Democratic
presidential candidate Sen. Hillary Clinton, who sent out mass e-mails to her
closest supporters expressing her disappointment toward Imus and his comment,
said Imus showed "small-minded bigotry and coarse sexism."
Imus was
fired in the middle of a two-day radio fundraiser for children's charities. CBS
announced that Imus' wife, Deirdre, and his longtime newsman, Charles McCord,
would host today's show.
Will Imus
move to Sirius? No one knows just yet. But losing Imus was a financial hit to
CBS Radio, since his program garnered $15 million in annual revenue. As for who
might replace Imus, one potential prospective would be the sports show "Mike
& the Mad Dog," which airs during the afternoon on WFAN.
Here's
what some of our DiversityInc readers had to say about the
firing:
His
out-of-context remarks may sound outrageous, but his unscripted personality on
TV shows him to be kind and open-hearted. What he did last week is not different
from what he has done for years. His satire is sometimes uncivil, but it
reflects what has become accepted by society. If MSNBC and CBS didn't like it,
they had control and could have forced restraint.
—Lawrence
Way
I
feel really sorry for Imus. I am a 33-year-old woman of color with a 3-year-old
daughter. Apparently, the poor thing has not realized that in this day and time,
we are no longer taking offensive remarks sitting down, nor are we turning a
deaf ear to comments like his. It is really unfortunate that all the good Imus
has done (raising money for charities, wing add at hospital, ranch for children
with cancer and autism) has been over shadowed by the darkness of his words. I
really do believe that Imus meant his comment as a joke and that he is truly
sorry for what he said, but the world should take note that the old saying of
"sticks and stones may break my bones, but words will never hurt me" is untrue.
You may think you can say and do as you please, just be prepared to face the
consequences.
—Marvalene
Freeman Elston
I
agree that what Imus said was wrong and inexcusable. Being black, I have been
subject to this type of stereotyping most of my life. However, I did not allow
that to influence my thinking and I refuse to allow it to identify me as such. I
have been blessed and have achieved what most would consider upper-middle-class
status. But I am still dismayed by the continual misuse of this type of language
within my own community. If we want it to stop, we as Afro-Americans have to set
the example. There will most likely always be an "Imus," and continuing to focus
on him and what he says just adds fuel to an already out-of-control blaze.
Additionally, we have to take the high road in this and others like this. We
should never condone it but we should not allow it to consume us. I choose to
forgive rather than sacrifice.
—Michael
(did not provide last name)
If
this incident has done one thing positive it's that it continues to shed light
on the issue of racism in the media and in our collective American culture. We
obviously still have much to dialogue about regarding race. This isn't about
freedom of speech, this is about the 800-pound gorilla standing in the corner
that no one wants to acknowledge. Sadly it takes a situation such as this to get
everyone to notice and begin talking again. And the thing about freedom of
speech is that there are still consequences for what a person says. Freedom of
speech doesn't guarantee you your job after you say something inappropriate or
in this case something that just wasn't very funny to begin with.
—Rob
Ferrera
Don
Imus and Bernard McGuirk should both be banished from the airways. Their
intended humor is so blatantly racist and sexist that they should not represent
CBS, MSNBC or any other radio and television company. Continuing their
commentary only emboldens and embraces speech that decent and fair-minded people
should all find offensive and objectionable.
—Thaddeus
Spratlen
More from Today's Diversity News NEXT ITEM >>
Send Your Comments About This Article Now
© DiversityInc 2008 ® All rights reserved. No article on this site can be reproduced by any means, print, electronic or any other, without prior written permission of the publisher.
|