The Hot News About Affirmative Action
What's next for What's Next for What happened? A federal court ordered What's in the blogs?
Many bloggers
support the federal court's decision, citing the 58 percent majority of
JMK, a self-professed
"working-class conservative" and FDNY firefighter, mocks Affirmative Action: Yes or No? What happened? Long-time affirmative-action foe Ward Connerly recently was
invited to speak before What's in the blogs? Inviting Ward Connerly to speak at an affirmative-action hearing
is like asking a KKK Grand Wizard to speak before a committee on race relations,
opines Joel McNally. He claims the Did anything positive come of Connerly's visit to Another blogger denounces the anti-affirmative-action movement as
a thinly veiled attempt to sustain white supremacy. While Connerly substantiates
his efforts by espousing concern for "reverse discrimination," this blogger
catches him on a vital point. There's no evidence, and Connerly knows it.
Read
more. As James Collier points out in his blog Acting
White, affirmative-action programs are needed to remedy past discrimination, but
the negative press surrounding the term sets its beneficiaries up to
fail. Read
more. Gerald Ford and Civil Rights What happened? Everyone remembers Gerald Ford as the only president never
elected, the man who helped the nation recover after Watergate and withdrew the
last troops from What's in the blogs? Some bloggers are wondering how he aligned these contradictory
viewpoints, while others argue they're not contradictory at all.
Affirmative-action foes blame the "left wing" for attempting to frame Ford's
legacy around civil rights--a subject they claim was a minimal priority on his
presidential agenda. One blogger writes, "The American dream was never intended for
black people to enjoy, and Ford maintained the status quo by approving
initiatives that benefited white people, and kept white privilege alive."
Read
more. Jeffrey Toobin, an Amherst Times writer, reminds the public that Ford was responsible for the amicus brief submitted by retired military officers in the 2003 University of Michigan cases--prose from which Sandra Day O'Connor adopted in her majority decision. This writer claims this brief, which Ford set in motion, may have been the most influential in the history of the Supreme Court. Read more.
More from Today's Diversity News | ||||||