2017 DiversityInc Top 50 Announcement Event

Mizzou Pres., Chancellor Resign — What Now?

As questions remain regarding the future of the University of Missouri, a look at what brought the university to this point.

Tim Wolfe

A powerful movement of protests and walkouts by students and faculty at the University of Missouri — and a boycott by the school’s revenue-generating Division I football team — in response to inaction by the administration surrounding increased racial tensions on campus accomplished its mission to topple the university’s ineffective leadership.

Student Action

Now that both President Tim Wolfe and Chancellor R. Bowen Loftin (who will be entering a new role at the university on Jan. 1, “advancing research,” he told reporters) have resigned, protestors are not giving up. Concerned Student 1950, the student group of activists behind the protests (named as such because the university first began admitting Black students in 1950), issued new demands following Wolfe’s resignation.

“Moving forward, Concerned Student 1950 demands an immediate meeting with the UM System Faculty Council, Board of Curators and the governor of the state of Missouri to discuss shared governance and create a system of holistic inclusion for all constituents,” said Marshall Allen, one of Concerned Student 1950’s original members.

Student activists have been working hard to effect change. They have made their voices heard with not only protests and walkouts but also with the use of social media. Payton Head, the president of the university’s student government, wrote a lengthy Facebook post in September, detailing his personal experiences with racism — including having racial slurs yelled at him on campus — as well as details of incidents of homophobia and racism experienced by his friends. This type of action connects what was initially considered a localized problem to similar incidents all across the nation, such as the racist cartoon that covered the SUNY Plattsburgh student newspaper, a “white girls only” party thrown by a Yale fraternity and a mockery of African culture by Princeton University’s swim and diving teams.

The football team even used the power of money to demand change. Black members of the team refused to participate in any football-related activities until Wolfe’s resignation; white teammates joined the boycott, too. The players planned not to take part in the team’s upcoming weekend game — a decision that would have cost the university an estimated $1 million as the school would continue to lose advertising from one of its biggest moneymakers. Incidentally, Wolfe’s resignation did not come until after the team declared its boycott.

While in his resignation Monday Wolfe said he took “full responsibility for this frustration and … inaction,” his departure is merely the first step in a long battle ahead. “This is just a beginning in dismantling systems of oppression in higher education, specifically the UM system,” Allen explained.

How Did We Get Here? 

According to Wolfe, “It is my belief we stopped listening to each other.”

However, “stopped listening” implies that there ever was a time Wolfe did listen. And given the university’s history of racist incidents, Wolfe had many opportunities to listen. He took his position of president in 2012 and, despite the university’s clear history of racial tensions, Wolfe did little to address the issues.

The problems began before Wolfe was even in the picture. In 2010, two students littered cotton balls outside the Gaines/Oldham Black Culture Center on campus. And despite a statement in 2010 by then-Chancellor Brady Deaton that the school “remain[s] committed to promoting and reinforcing diversity at MU,” there had been no substantial efforts to that effect until last month, when another racial incident in October prompted just-resigned Chancellor Loftin to order students and faculty to participate in diversity training in 2016.

But despite the seemingly deep concerns of the two former chancellors regarding the 2010 incident, the commitment appears to have fallen through the cracks. In 2010, 82.1 percent of the university’s undergraduate students were white, while just 7.2 percent were Black, according to the university’s website. In 2014, the numbers hardly changed, falling to 79 percent white students and moving to 8 percent for Black students — a less than 1 percentage point increase.

Faculty demographics do not fare much better. In 2010, 78.7 percent of full-time faculty members were white, with just 2.61 percent being Black. In 2014, the number of whites went to 75 percent, while Blacks represented 3 percent — an increase of less than half of a percentage point.

And racially charged incidents continued. The inaction following Head’s Facebook post prompted protests from students. At a rally last month, one frustrated student said, “We are one bad decision away from a killing on this campus because it is segregated.”

But even statements like that were not enough to create a dialogue. Concerned Student 1950 then created a list of demands for the university, which included increasing the number of Black staff and faculty members to 10 percent as well as the creation of a long-term plan to retain a more diverse student population.

After the demands were drafted, a swastika made of feces appeared on a dormitory bathroom, and protests continued. Only after this incident did Wolfe agree to meet with Concerned Student 1950, where Wolfe allegedly did not agree to any of the changes the group proposed.

On Nov. 8, the football team announced its participation in the boycott. The following day, Wolfe resigned.

Aftermath

According to the university, one of its next courses of action is to hire its first chief diversity, inclusion, and equity officer. While this sounds like a good initiative, it emphasizes the fact that the university didn’t have someone in charge of diversity prior to these recent events.

And as seen in other incidents of racism on college campuses, simply having the position is not always enough. At the University of Louisville, President James Ramsey hosted a very offensive costume party, where he and his staff members dressed in stereotypical Mexican attire, wearing sombreros, ponchos and fake mustaches. The university has a person who serves as Director of the Office of Hispanic and Latino Initiatives, yet such an incident still occurred.

The university has also said it will now offer diversity training to new students, as well as faculty and staff members. However, only time will tell how effective the training is, since the university has a proven history of not following through with its alleged diversity initiatives.

Recommended Articles

7 comments


  • Jim Bob Lassiter

    Why don’t you go run the skool Lickspittle Luke? I’m sure you could get everything all straightened out.

    • A ouija board and a magic 8-ball could have done a better job.

      Back away from the Old Milwaukee, Jim Bob, you’re going to end up drooling on your Gateway 2000.

  • Frank McCloskey

    The writer of this article has presented a very thoughtful and realistic overview of what the University’s long term objectives should or will be; deep reflection, commitment and institutional processes and oversight in place to ultimately redefine the culture and its DNA, or “check off” measures that do nothing and the University ends back up in this same crap hole at some other time down the road. Luke, thankfully DiversityInc provides a roadmap taken from the best of the best in this space for any organization to learn from if they sincerely want to change. So will the University blink or not?

  • Here’s what’s next: false accusations, innuendo, and “he said/she said” lies. It’ll be kinda like the way so many colleges refuse even the first few steps of due process to those accused (anonymously, sometimes) of sexual harassment or assault

    ” University of Missouri campus that resulted in the school president stepping down, the on-campus police department advised all students to contact them in the event of hateful speech, reports the Missourian.

    In an email to all students, the campus cops admit that “speech is not a crime” but they would like to be notified in case school disciplinary measures may eventually come into play.

    “While cases of hateful and hurtful speech are not crimes, if the individual(s) identified are students, MU’s Office of Student Conduct can take disciplinary action,” the email stated.

    Among the many issues facing the campus that resulted in the protests were accusations that white students were using racist language on campus.”

    RawStory.com

      • And here’s another guess for “What now?” from professor and commentator Victor Davis Hanson, who suggests that, henceforth, “All hiring, admission, and participation shall reflect the racial diversity of the campus — except sports teams, given that sports is a far more important activity than scholarship and teaching and thus alone requires selection solely on legitimate criteria of merit.”

  • And from my above RawStory excerpt, there were accusations that white students were using racist language on campus.

    Maybe. But maybe they were just singing along, if one might call it “singing”, with some of today’s best hottest hippity-hop urban rappers.

« Previous Article     Next Article »