The FBI Is Afraid of Black People

When it comes to Black social justice groups, the FBI’s motto is, “Monitor now, ask questions later.”

A protester during a silent demonstration after a white Ferguson police officer shot and killed Michael Brown in St. Louis, Missouri, March 14, 2015. / REUTERS

The FBI is once again targeting Black Lives Matter and also expressed fear of “black supremacist extremists” launching violent attacks at the Democratic and Republican National Conventions, according to FBI and Department of Homeland Security documents.

Related Story

Jeff Sessions, U.S. Attorney General Ties Gang Violence to Immigration

Sessions’ FBI Finds New Terrorists: Black People

After white Nazis march on Charlottesville, a white man shoots 500 people in Las Vegas and another white man slaughters 26 people in a Texas church, the white people running the FBI and DOJ are concerned about “Black Identity Extremism.”

Records and emails from July 2016 were obtained and released in part Tuesday by Al Jazeera.

According to one set of emails from July 8, 2016, the FBI feared large-scale attacks from BLM after lone gunman Micah Xavier Johnson killed five police officers in Dallas, Texas, that same month.

“Due to sensitivities surrounding recent police shootings, the threat of copycat attacks against law enforcement exist[s],” according to the email.
“There is a threat of black supremacist extremists attempting to violently co-opt the upcoming DNC/RNC.”

The email in question does not elaborate on the “threat,” nor does it define “black supremacist extremists.”

BLM issued a statement at the time of the shooting separating itself from Johnson and rejecting the notion that BLM condones violence.

“Black activists have raised the call for an end to violence, not an escalation of it,” the organization said at the time. “Yesterday’s attack was the result of the actions of a lone gunman. To assign the actions of one person to an entire movement is dangerous and irresponsible. We continue our efforts to bring about a better world for all of us.”

The FBI email also states more than once that Johnson acted alone:

“There was only 1 shooter (Johnson). Johnson is dead.” 

“Dallas officials report the deceased barricaded gunman acted alone.”

“The [Dallas chief of police] also briefed that prior to his death, Johnson stated he had acted alone.”

But that did not stop the FBI from figuring out ways to spy on BLM protests and seemingly make it legal.

In another set of emails the FBI acknowledges that BLM protests are protected by the First Amendment. Therefore, the email includes a “caveat” to be placed on “any documents containing relevant information.”

The loophole states, in part:

“However, based on known intelligence and/or specific, historical observations, it is possible the protected activity could invite a violent reaction towards the subject individuals or groups, or the activity could be used as a means to target law enforcement. In the event no violent reaction occurs, FBI policy and federal law dictates that no further record be made of the protected activity.”

Two organizations, Color Of Change (COC) and the Center for Constitutional Rights (CCR), sued to have the emails in question made public. Omar Farah, a lead attorney with the CCR, explained to Al Jazeera that the threat of surveillance is enough even if the FBI does not make a record of it.

“Surveillance is what chills people from mobilising and organizing,” Farah told Al Jazeera.

A third document, also dated July 8, advised caution during a “Day of Rage” event that was supposedly taking place on July 15.

“Being anywhere near these protests greatly increases the chance that you could become a victim of violence. When the mob mentality takes over, normally decent people can commit heinous acts,” the advisory states.

The note also includes a list of about three dozen locations where protests were allegedly taking place, calling them “places NOT to be.”

BLM tweeted at the time that there was no such protest planned.

According to Snopes, the “Day of Rage” mirrored a similar hoax that launched in August 2014 after the shooting death of Michael Brown by a police officer in Ferguson:

“In the wake of the controversial police shooting incident, rumors were swirling that the hacktivist collective Anonymous — acting in solidarity with the Black Lives Matter (BLM) movement — had called for ‘Day of Rage’ protests to be staged in cities across the United States on 21 August 2014.”

“Two years later, in July 2016, the shooting deaths of two black men — Alton Sterling in Baton Rouge and Philando Castile in a suburb of St. Paul, Minnesota — by white police officers prompted another round of protests,” Snopes continues. “Rumors again spread online that Anonymous had called for ‘Day of Rage’ protests to be staged in 36 (or 39) cities across the United States on 15 July 2016.”

So what happened on the day in question? Nothing, more or less, other than a few scattered protests across the country.

Related Story

FBI’s Attempt to Smear, Discredit MLK Highlighted in Newly Released Documents

FBI’s Attempt to Smear, Discredit MLK Highlighted in Newly Released Documents

Today, the FBI continues its attempt to create fear and paranoia surrounding racial justice movements.

A DHS Field Analysis Report (FAR) from September 2016 did study white supremacist protests — but the language is strikingly different.

The document is titled: “California: Recent Violent Clashes Suggest Heightened Threat Environment at Lawfully Organized White Supremacist Events.” The report followed two white supremacist rallies that took place in Chicago earlier that year. According to DHS, violence occurred thanks to counterprotesters who attended the event.

In Sacramento, “violent anti-fascists, including anarchist extremist elements, attacked a group of white supremacists who gathered for a legally permitted rally.”

“There are a number of potential indicators of planned criminal or violent activities at white supremacist events. Some of these behavioral indicators may be constitutionally protected activities and should be supported by additional facts to justify increased suspicion,” the report states.

One year after the report, 32-year-old Heather Heyer lost her life at a neo-Nazi rally in Charlottesville, Va., when a white supremacist drove a vehicle into a crowd of counterprotesters.

According to the FBI and DHS, therefore, BLM and Black social justice movements should be under surveillance, and if recorded activity does not indicate a threat, a “caveat” can be included with the records. But for white supremacist activity, “additional facts” must be present “to justify increased suspicion.”

Brandi Collins, Color Of Change’s campaign director, said to Al Jazeera, “The subtext here is stunning.”

“It tells us who the government is training to view as threats and the rightful targets of ongoing surveillance and which groups will be offered protection,” Collins added.

Related Story

Jeff Sessions’ DOJ Has Zero Black Senior Staff Members

Sessions’ DOJ Has Zero Black Senior Staff Members

Sessions was also “not aware” that 91 percent of judges nominated to the bench have been white and male.

The FBI has produced other reports similar to the ones obtained by Al Jazeera. A report (obtained by Foreign Policy) was released in August titled “Black Identity Extremists Likely Motivated to Target Law Enforcement Officers.” The report cites the Michael Brown shooting and the subsequent decision not to indict the officer who killed him as evidence that “Black Identity Extremists” (BIEs) are likely to target law enforcement.

“The FBI assesses it is very likely Black Identity Extremist (BIE) perceptions of police brutality against African Americans spurred an increase in premeditated, retaliatory lethal violence against law enforcement and will very likely serve as justification for such violence,” according to the document.

At a recent House Judiciary Committee meeting, Rep. Karen Bass, a California Democrat, questioned U.S. Attorney General Jefferson Beauregard Sessions III about the report. Sessions claimed to not have seen it or have any knowledge of it.

“I’m not sure how that report got ordered,” he said. “I don’t believe I explicitly approved or directed it.”

Read more news @ DiversityInc.com

Recommended Articles

11 comments

Leave a Reply

*Your email address will not be published


  • Greg Thrasher

    The FBI is not afraid of Black Americans that is a dangerous myth for Black Americans to embrace.

    The FBI is to be regarded as dangerous and a government agency that threatens our liberty and creates peril for Black Americans

    We cannot be passive and asleep at the wheel here during the Trump Era

    BLM

    Reply
    • “The FBI is not afraid of Black Americans that is a dangerous myth for Black Americans to embrace.”

      In my opinion, the author wasn’t suggesting that the FBI is afraid of Black folks in a literal “scared”, “quaking in their boots” sense.

      I believe the author is using “afraid” in a “mocking” sort of way to criticize the FBI for its overreaction (hysterics) -as suggested by internal emails and reports- in unjustifiably characterizing Black advocacy groups and supporters as some sort of existential threat requiring extreme levels of vigilance, unlawful surveillance, and yes, incredibly, in some cases, even avoidance of areas where such groups are expected to be exercising their First Amendment rights.

      Aside from that small quibble, I completely agree with everything you said.

      Reply
  • Monitor blacks? The FBI needs to look at white men that collect guns on Facebook, Twitter, and those sites that attract the crazies. Does rich white guy with lots of guns and bump-stocks in Vegas sound familiar?

    Reply
  • Michael J. "Orange Mike" Lowrey

    Clear back to that pathetic closetcase and unionbuster J. Edgar Hoover, the FBI has a history of making up these categories like “Black Identity Extremists/BIEs” which have no basis either in political science or criminology, and then putting people into the pigeonholes so they can be classified as dangerous subversives without the rights accorded normal people.

    Reply
  • “There are a number of potential indicators of planned criminal or violent activities at white supremacist events. Some of these behavioral indicators may be constitutionally protected activities and should be supported by additional facts to justify increased suspicion”

    The transparency of the FBI’s racism is breathtaking!

    So white supremacist groups which have produced mass murderers such as Dylan Roof, whose activities and motivations,can ACTUALLY be directly tied to such groups and their expressed “philosophies”, require “additional facts” before “potential indicators of planned criminal or violent activities”, trigger increased suspicion/surveillance by the FBI. Whereas a Black cop killer, requires nothing more than the color of his skin and timing, for the FBI to intimately tie him and his motivations to the nearest scapegoat Black advocacy group, in spite of BLM’s repeated public espousal of nonviolence.

    Right. Just more confirmation of the fact that Blacks’ perceived persecution by this country’s law enforcement apparatus, is all in their heads/imagination (extreme sarcasm).

    Reply
    • And what kills me about this sudden declaration that so-called “black identity extremists” exist is the fact that the FBI clearly can’t point to one single terrorist action by BLM or any other black activist group committed anywhere, because there haven’t been any,period! It’s just a way,it seems, to demonize any black activists who are outspoken about and challenging the inequities in the status quo, so to speak. Reminds me of when activist groups were put on a certain “watch list” to be watched during Bush’s second term (in 2005) and grouped with actual terrorist groups. Look that up.

      Reply
  • Elijah Williams

    Clearly these orders and notifications are the source of the fear by police officers and their over reactions towards black people that have resulted in innocent lives taken. Leadership planting fear to those uniform. What’s most alarming the white hate groups seems to be protected not even mentioned. America as a people we must be better. This is the promise land where we are one nation under God indivisible with liberty and justice for all. The same people who violates women’s civil rights are busy violating everyone’s civil-rights. This is proof denying one American’s right is denying everyone’s civil-rights. Vote them out. Drain the swamp of in humanity

    Reply
  • If black folk need anymore evidence that this administrations agenda is 21st century cointelpro I don’t know what to tell them.

    Reply
« Previous Article     Next Article »