<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Forced Institutionalization of People With Disabilities Is Illegal</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.diversityinc.com/legal-issues/forced-institutionalization-of-people-with-disabilities-is-illegal/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.diversityinc.com/legal-issues/forced-institutionalization-of-people-with-disabilities-is-illegal/</link>
	<description>DiversityInc: Diversity and the Bottom Line</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Apr 2013 13:22:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: BigFish</title>
		<link>http://www.diversityinc.com/legal-issues/forced-institutionalization-of-people-with-disabilities-is-illegal/comment-page-1/#comment-9639</link>
		<dc:creator>BigFish</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Oct 2012 05:04:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-9639</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As a woman who became disabled 31 years ago, and whose family fought to keep me from being institutionalized, I cannot believe this type of forced action is still taking place in America today.

Had I been institutionalized 31 years ago, I most likely would have passed away due to secondary issues such as bed sores, infections, etc.

Instead today I hold two degrees, I am a successful business woman, married, with a beautiful five year old daughter, and I would like to believe, I have made a difference in the communities I have lived.

For any of you who are questioning the &quot;cost&quot; of reversing this forced action - ask yourselves, what would you do if tomorrow you awoke in an institution (nursing home, etc.), and were stripped of your rights of freedom. You could not leave of your own accord. You could not choose your meals, or activities for the day. You would be forced to sit and wait out your existence. 

Think of this...then decide...what can you do to SAVE these innocent people, and give them life?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a woman who became disabled 31 years ago, and whose family fought to keep me from being institutionalized, I cannot believe this type of forced action is still taking place in America today.</p>
<p>Had I been institutionalized 31 years ago, I most likely would have passed away due to secondary issues such as bed sores, infections, etc.</p>
<p>Instead today I hold two degrees, I am a successful business woman, married, with a beautiful five year old daughter, and I would like to believe, I have made a difference in the communities I have lived.</p>
<p>For any of you who are questioning the &#8220;cost&#8221; of reversing this forced action &#8211; ask yourselves, what would you do if tomorrow you awoke in an institution (nursing home, etc.), and were stripped of your rights of freedom. You could not leave of your own accord. You could not choose your meals, or activities for the day. You would be forced to sit and wait out your existence. </p>
<p>Think of this&#8230;then decide&#8230;what can you do to SAVE these innocent people, and give them life?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.diversityinc.com/legal-issues/forced-institutionalization-of-people-with-disabilities-is-illegal/comment-page-1/#comment-951</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Oct 2010 11:33:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-951</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is very upsetting on both sides of the issue.  Nice news for this lady but bad news for taxpayers.  Also bad news for millions of people  in nursing homes who have lost their bank accounts and homes to pay for their nursing home care.  I do not know one person that went into a nursing home who did not try to find care at home first.  The cost is prohibitive.  You cannot find private people who will do it.  Agency fees were prohibitive to most.  Notice I say were.  Pandora&#039;s Box has been opened.  I look for this to be overturned.   It is hard enough for nursing homes to find staff at the low wages they must pay.  And one staff person can care for 8 or more in a home.  One RN per floor.  This lady&#039;s would need her own RN daily, her own cook, her own aides...  Sorry but get real.  At best I would say the state could kick in the same dollars paid to keep her in a nursing home.  The burden would be on her to find someone to work for that.  She will never find any one.  There is nothing fair for a quadriplegic.  Society can not afford the luxury the courts have afforded this lady.  So very sorry not to be her champion...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is very upsetting on both sides of the issue.  Nice news for this lady but bad news for taxpayers.  Also bad news for millions of people  in nursing homes who have lost their bank accounts and homes to pay for their nursing home care.  I do not know one person that went into a nursing home who did not try to find care at home first.  The cost is prohibitive.  You cannot find private people who will do it.  Agency fees were prohibitive to most.  Notice I say were.  Pandora&#8217;s Box has been opened.  I look for this to be overturned.   It is hard enough for nursing homes to find staff at the low wages they must pay.  And one staff person can care for 8 or more in a home.  One RN per floor.  This lady&#8217;s would need her own RN daily, her own cook, her own aides&#8230;  Sorry but get real.  At best I would say the state could kick in the same dollars paid to keep her in a nursing home.  The burden would be on her to find someone to work for that.  She will never find any one.  There is nothing fair for a quadriplegic.  Society can not afford the luxury the courts have afforded this lady.  So very sorry not to be her champion&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.diversityinc.com/legal-issues/forced-institutionalization-of-people-with-disabilities-is-illegal/comment-page-1/#comment-950</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Oct 2010 10:03:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-950</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In Medicaid, &quot;institution&quot; is defined as a nursing home.

Olmstead applies to all people with disabilities, including younger adults with physical disabilities, older adults with aging-related disabilities and adults with developmental disabilities.

The state&#039;s requirement that people enter a nursing home for 60 days before accessing home and community based services in Medicaid is completely illogical from a consumer&#039;s point of view. State budgetary crises have forced many states to put waiting lists or to impose onerous requirements on their community based care programs. Health reform does give states considerable additional funding for these programs, so hopefully these problems will become less acute in the years to come.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In Medicaid, &#8220;institution&#8221; is defined as a nursing home.</p>
<p>Olmstead applies to all people with disabilities, including younger adults with physical disabilities, older adults with aging-related disabilities and adults with developmental disabilities.</p>
<p>The state&#8217;s requirement that people enter a nursing home for 60 days before accessing home and community based services in Medicaid is completely illogical from a consumer&#8217;s point of view. State budgetary crises have forced many states to put waiting lists or to impose onerous requirements on their community based care programs. Health reform does give states considerable additional funding for these programs, so hopefully these problems will become less acute in the years to come.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.diversityinc.com/legal-issues/forced-institutionalization-of-people-with-disabilities-is-illegal/comment-page-1/#comment-949</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Oct 2010 16:06:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-949</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Interesting that the US courts will entertain ADA type actions but yet they are exempt from the ADA; leaving pro se litigants vulnerable to abuse from the other side unl;less the court will grant special accommodations and assist the pro se litigant with obtaining those services.  ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting that the US courts will entertain ADA type actions but yet they are exempt from the ADA; leaving pro se litigants vulnerable to abuse from the other side unl;less the court will grant special accommodations and assist the pro se litigant with obtaining those services.  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.diversityinc.com/legal-issues/forced-institutionalization-of-people-with-disabilities-is-illegal/comment-page-1/#comment-948</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Oct 2010 12:18:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-948</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[People with health problems--even if their ignorance has brought on the problem--have a right to decent care, I would think. Health is not a commodity to be bought by the wealthy and to be kept scarce for the poor. A community shares its wealth to take care of the members of the community where they face calamities that go beyond their financial abilities. In that sense, the tax payer does not own tax money; the tax payer owes to the community whatever s/he makes beyond his/her need. I think Warren Buffett has addressed that issue quite nicely in a recent interview. Brevity may make this sound like a pontification, but I think that a solid case can be made in support of this view. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>People with health problems&#8211;even if their ignorance has brought on the problem&#8211;have a right to decent care, I would think. Health is not a commodity to be bought by the wealthy and to be kept scarce for the poor. A community shares its wealth to take care of the members of the community where they face calamities that go beyond their financial abilities. In that sense, the tax payer does not own tax money; the tax payer owes to the community whatever s/he makes beyond his/her need. I think Warren Buffett has addressed that issue quite nicely in a recent interview. Brevity may make this sound like a pontification, but I think that a solid case can be made in support of this view. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.diversityinc.com/legal-issues/forced-institutionalization-of-people-with-disabilities-is-illegal/comment-page-1/#comment-947</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Aug 2010 04:42:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-947</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Just imagine all the people in guardianships who are locked away that could be and should be allowed to live in their homes and in the community.
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just imagine all the people in guardianships who are locked away that could be and should be allowed to live in their homes and in the community.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.diversityinc.com/legal-issues/forced-institutionalization-of-people-with-disabilities-is-illegal/comment-page-1/#comment-946</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jul 2010 13:23:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-946</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What is the definition of &quot;institution&quot;? If that applies to sheltered workshops and group homes, I know a lot of people that feel those are their only choices; but are capable of much more integrated living.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What is the definition of &#8220;institution&#8221;? If that applies to sheltered workshops and group homes, I know a lot of people that feel those are their only choices; but are capable of much more integrated living.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.diversityinc.com/legal-issues/forced-institutionalization-of-people-with-disabilities-is-illegal/comment-page-1/#comment-945</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jun 2010 11:28:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-945</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Does this apply to those who are disabled because of illnesses associated with aging? ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does this apply to those who are disabled because of illnesses associated with aging? </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.diversityinc.com/legal-issues/forced-institutionalization-of-people-with-disabilities-is-illegal/comment-page-1/#comment-944</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Jun 2010 20:55:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-944</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[this decision has the potential for enormous ramifications for persons with disabilities as well as taxpayers. how does the government balance the two factors? Realistically people only have a right to what they can afford or can be afforded to be be provided. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>this decision has the potential for enormous ramifications for persons with disabilities as well as taxpayers. how does the government balance the two factors? Realistically people only have a right to what they can afford or can be afforded to be be provided. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>