<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: War Crimes &amp; Oppression: Doing Business Where Human Rights Are the Issue (VIDEO)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.diversityinc.com/diversity-events/war-crimes-oppression-doing-business-where-human-rights-are-the-issue-video/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.diversityinc.com/diversity-events/war-crimes-oppression-doing-business-where-human-rights-are-the-issue-video/</link>
	<description>DiversityInc: Diversity and the Bottom Line</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Apr 2013 18:40:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.diversityinc.com/diversity-events/war-crimes-oppression-doing-business-where-human-rights-are-the-issue-video/comment-page-1/#comment-624</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 23:38:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-624</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In Southeast Asia, Taiwan also has a serious &quot;war crimes&quot; issue which underlies the functioning of the local government, Republic of China (ROC), at every level.  After the close of fighting in WWII, the ROC military forces under Chiang Kai-shek were directed to go to Taiwan and accept the surrender of Japanese troops.   The date of the Japanese surrender on the island, Oct. 25, 1945, of course marks the beginning of the military occupation.  However, the ROC officials announced this as &quot;Taiwan Retrocession Day.&quot;  Such an announcement, which shows a clear intent to make &quot;annexation&quot; of what is actually militarily occupied territory, is a war crime.

Next, the ROC officials announced the mass naturalization of native Taiwanese persons as &quot;ROC citizens&quot; in Jan. 1946, but the mass naturalization of native persons in occupied territory is also a war crime.   Then the ROC government began military conscription policies over the native Taiwanese populace in the late 1940s, before the post-war peace treaty had even been drafted, to commit a third war crime.

In most fields of endeavor, &quot;three strikes and you are out&quot; is the rule, however the international community has not sought to punish the ROC for its flagrant misrule over the native Taiwanese people, with the result that the illegal ROC government continues to administer and control Taiwan up to the present day, all the while proclaiming itself to be a sovereign government.

In fact, the ROC is only a subordinate occupying power (beginning Oct. 25, 1945) and government in exile (beginning Dec. 1949).  The obvious question which must be raised is: As a American investor in Taiwan, is one allowed to tell the local government officials that &quot;The ROC is not the legal government of Taiwan?&quot;   ??

To what extent is it possible to get US Congressional officials involved in such clarifications?  Perhaps Raymond M. Brown could discuss matters such as these in a follow up article.
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In Southeast Asia, Taiwan also has a serious &#8220;war crimes&#8221; issue which underlies the functioning of the local government, Republic of China (ROC), at every level.  After the close of fighting in WWII, the ROC military forces under Chiang Kai-shek were directed to go to Taiwan and accept the surrender of Japanese troops.   The date of the Japanese surrender on the island, Oct. 25, 1945, of course marks the beginning of the military occupation.  However, the ROC officials announced this as &#8220;Taiwan Retrocession Day.&#8221;  Such an announcement, which shows a clear intent to make &#8220;annexation&#8221; of what is actually militarily occupied territory, is a war crime.</p>
<p>Next, the ROC officials announced the mass naturalization of native Taiwanese persons as &#8220;ROC citizens&#8221; in Jan. 1946, but the mass naturalization of native persons in occupied territory is also a war crime.   Then the ROC government began military conscription policies over the native Taiwanese populace in the late 1940s, before the post-war peace treaty had even been drafted, to commit a third war crime.</p>
<p>In most fields of endeavor, &#8220;three strikes and you are out&#8221; is the rule, however the international community has not sought to punish the ROC for its flagrant misrule over the native Taiwanese people, with the result that the illegal ROC government continues to administer and control Taiwan up to the present day, all the while proclaiming itself to be a sovereign government.</p>
<p>In fact, the ROC is only a subordinate occupying power (beginning Oct. 25, 1945) and government in exile (beginning Dec. 1949).  The obvious question which must be raised is: As a American investor in Taiwan, is one allowed to tell the local government officials that &#8220;The ROC is not the legal government of Taiwan?&#8221;   ??</p>
<p>To what extent is it possible to get US Congressional officials involved in such clarifications?  Perhaps Raymond M. Brown could discuss matters such as these in a follow up article.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.diversityinc.com/diversity-events/war-crimes-oppression-doing-business-where-human-rights-are-the-issue-video/comment-page-1/#comment-623</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 17:51:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-623</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Actually, the current thinking is that these words were first uttered in the 19th century by an abolitionist named Ted Parker.  Both Dr. King and more recently President Obama (inter alia) have used and paraphrased this concept.  I attributed it to Parker when I spoke last week.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, the current thinking is that these words were first uttered in the 19th century by an abolitionist named Ted Parker.  Both Dr. King and more recently President Obama (inter alia) have used and paraphrased this concept.  I attributed it to Parker when I spoke last week.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.diversityinc.com/diversity-events/war-crimes-oppression-doing-business-where-human-rights-are-the-issue-video/comment-page-1/#comment-622</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 12:51:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-622</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The quote referenced in the article by Gail Zappo and used by Mr. Raymond L. Brown was made by Dr. Martin Luther King and should be attributred to him.
As the article currently reads it implies that it is an original statement.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The quote referenced in the article by Gail Zappo and used by Mr. Raymond L. Brown was made by Dr. Martin Luther King and should be attributred to him.<br />
As the article currently reads it implies that it is an original statement.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>