Reserve Your Spot at the 2015 DiversityInc Top 50 Announcement Event!

April 23, Cipriani Wall Street

 Early-Bird Pricing Ends 12/31

Register Now

Obama Joins Corporate Outcry Against Boy Scouts’ Gay Ban

Will the Boy Scouts Allow Gay Members and Troop Leaders?Should the Boy Scouts lift its gay ban? Yes, said President Obama during an interview with CBS News’ Scott Pelley.

“My attitude is that gays and lesbians should have access and opportunity the same way everybody else does, in every institution and walk of life,” Obama said, noting that the Boy Scouts provides young people opportunities and leadership and that “nobody should be barred from that.”

Boy Scouts to Lift Gay Ban?

Corporate pressure from companies such as Ernst & Young, AT&T and Merck & Co. certainly contributed to the Boy Scouts of America’s apparent decision to end its ban on gay scouts and troop leaders, with a formal announcement expected as early as next week. The new policy would leave membership decisions up to the Boy Scouts’ 290 local councils and 116,000 sponsors, which are comprised of religious and civic groups.

“The Boy Scouts of America have heard from scouts, corporations and millions of Americans that discriminating against gay scouts and scout leaders is wrong,” said Herndon Graddick, President of GLAAD, an advocacy group for LGBTs. “Scouting is a valuable institution, and this change will only strengthen its core principles of fairness and respect.”

“Last year Scouting realized the policy caused some volunteers and chartered organizations … to act in conflict with their missions, principles or religious beliefs,” said Boy Scouts of America spokesperson Deron Smith. “It’s important to note this policy would not require any chartered organization to act in ways inconsistent with that organization’s mission, principles or religious beliefs.”

Change of Heart?

However, many news sources say the Boy Scouts’ sudden reversal is less about conflicting missions—after all, the policy had been in place since before the Supreme Court upheld its constitutionality in 2000—and more about societal pressure to shift toward more inclusive practices.

The announcement comes just seven months after Boy Scouts of America was slammed nationally for reaffirming its anti-gay membership policy after nearly two years of examination, and just one month after Merck & Co ended its funding to the Boy Scouts.

In addition to continual chiding from the public, Boy Scouts of America evoked strong reactions from senior executives and other diversity leaders at top corporations—in particular, Ernst & Young Chairman and CEO Jim Turley and AT&T Chairman, CEO and President Randall Stephenson, who are both BSA board members. Turley very publicly urged the Boy Scouts to reconsider the policy to better reflect the times; the Girl Scouts, 4-H clubs and the U.S. military all have policies of inclusion.

“I support the meaningful work of the Boy Scouts in preparing young people for adventure, leadership, learning and service. However, the membership policy is not one I would personally endorse,” Turley said last June. “As I have done in leading Ernst & Young to being a most inclusive organization, I intend to continue to work from within the BSA board to actively encourage dialogue and sustainable progress.”

Ernst & Young is No. 6 in the DiversityInc Top 50 and No. 4 in The DiversityInc Top 10 Companies for LGBT Employees. AT&T is No. 4 in the DiversityInc Top 50 and No. 8 in The DiversityInc Top 10 Companies for LGBT Employees. Merck & Co. is No. 16 in the DiversityInc Top 50. All three companies have a 100 percent rating on the Corporate Equality Index from the Human Rights Campaign, which designates those organizations demonstrating workplace equality for LGBT employees.

Tags:

6 Comments

  • grannybunny

    There’s a huge difference between lifting the ban/leaving the policy up to the local councils and taking an affirmative stand against discrimination based on sexual orientation. Would the Boy Scouts take the same half-hearted approach to discrimination based on race or religion? Half a loaf is better than none, but that’s all this is, and long overdue.

  • What took so long was their inability to simply admit that they’re wrong. Further, or perhaps even first and foremost, is their loss of financial support. It’s typically always about money or its loss.

    When will ‘they’ simply understand, accept, and admit that gay men engage in consensual relationships with other gay men (i.e., men of legal age), as well as the fact that homosexuality and pedophilia have nothing to do with each other? Further, why do theyfoolishly and stupidly believe that homosexuality is immoral, by definition, while heterosexuals who are immoral are simply exceptions to the rule? It’s no different than saying ‘all Jews are X, and only some gentiles are x.’ (e.g., (all) Jews are tight with money, while some gentiles are thrifty; (all) Blacks are lazy, while some whites are lazy). It’s illogical and bigotry wrapped in arrogance and prejudice with the intent to discriminate.

  • Agreed, grannybunny. Couldn’t have said it better myself.

  • Babybunny

    This article is so typical of Diversity Inc.’s overly strident tone in its publications. For example, the Boy Scouts to exactly what you want them to. So, what’s your reaction? “What took so long?” Conveniently placed in the title of the article.

    How clever — just think how hard the Boy Scouts will work to implement their policies that Diversity Inc. wants to accomplish, now that they’ve been “slapped in the face in writing” for doing something you approve of.

    Just brilliant…

    • Luke Visconti

      Please, we’re hardly the only ones who feel this way—the entire country has been voting with its feet. The number of Boy Scouts has been dropping every year for quite some time now. They’re evaporating. The organization only did this because its back is against the wall. The next big bulletin you’ll see is the Republican party doing something to draw more than 22 percent of the nonwhite electorate to win the presidency. Go pin a medal on them. Luke Visconti, CEO, DiversityInc

  • Please, the group is named the boy scouts. Not the queer up your boy scouts. Children need protection from preditors and twisted sexual agendas. We want marriges and babies.
    Certainly you are not confused about babies being a good thing.

Leave a Reply


Close

Receive DiversityInc Newsletters and Alerts