This Web Accessibility icon serves as a link to download eSSENTIAL Accessibility assistive technology software for individuals with physical disabilities.

FEATURES











Be notified when we post new Disability articles on our website!
We will not sell or share your email address, ever! Please read our Privacy Policy.
What Are the Best Words for Disabilities?
By Lizz Carroll - Oct 29, 2009
Photo

Also read: things not to say, disability, legislation, workplace, peer relationships

Maybe it seems obvious that you shouldn't use the word "retarded," but what about other terms like "handicapped" or "special"? What language should you choose when speaking about or communicating with people with disabilities? DiversityInc asked experts to provide guidance on choosing the right words.

Best Words

Although there are several different accepted terms and words for people with disabilities, one thing is for sure: "The disability shouldn't be the focus—it's just a condition the person has, not how we define the person," says Lori Golden, Ernst & Young's AccessAbilities leader and inclusiveness consultant. AccessAbilities is an employee-resource group at Ernst & Young (No. 3 in The 2009 DiversityInc Top 50 Companies for Diversity®) that provides guidance on and raises awareness of workplace issues affecting people with disabilities.

Golden adds that "'Disabilities' is a widely accepted term. 'With differing abilities' or 'differently-abled' are fine, though less common. Those last two terms are reminders that each of us has abilities that are greater or lesser—it's just a question of what those are."

To read more about how you can be part of changing the definition of disability, visit DiversityIncBestPractices.com.

Deborah Dagit, vice president and chief diversity officer of Merck & Co. (No. 8 in the DiversityInc Top 50), recommends, "For referring to the group, I think 'people with disabilities' in the United States is still the preferred term, or the 'people-first language' that was recommended at the time when the Americans with Disabilities Act was passed."

"People-first language" puts emphasis on placing the individual BEFORE the disability. Two examples are "people with disabilities," not "disabled people," or "the manager who is blind" and not "the blind manager."

As a corporation, Merck & Co. has chosen the term "differently abled." "Unfortunately, the word 'disability' in many languages does not translate in a positive way," says Dagit. Outside the office, however, she recognizes varying opinions about that term. "I think 'differently abled' is evolving as we become more truly global in search for a language that works across geographic boundaries. But I wouldn't say that's the term that everyone would choose," she adds.

Which companies understand the best ways to recruit, retain and promote people with disabilities? Check out The DiversityInc Top 10 Companies for People With Disabilities list.

Nancy Starnes, director of external affairs for the National Organization on Disability (NOD), wouldn't choose that term for herself. "I prefer 'people with disabilities,' since 'differently' suggests setting me apart from the general population," she says. "I'm no different than thousands of other wheelchair users. I think of differently abled as a category for super athletes, computer high-techies or brainiacs. My knowledge and abilities are pretty average."

But if you ask Jim Sinocchi, director of workforce communications for IBM Corp. (No. 10 in the DiversityInc Top 50), he's not really one for semantics. While he prefers the term "people with disabilities," the language he would choose would simply reflect "people [being] respectful, thoughtful and considerate to another human being."

Words to Avoid

Unfortunately, some of the offensive or incorrect terms have woven themselves into our common speech, words such as "special" and "wheelchair-bound." Make sure that you steer clear of any of the following terminology:

'Retarded'

"When I grew up, 'retarded' was the term used for people with below-average intelligence," says Golden. "Now, it's much more acceptable to say someone has intellectual, developmental or cognitive disabilities." Outside the medical field, Golden also advises using "mental-health issue" or "condition" instead of "mental illness."

'Handicapped'

"[This term] connotes a time when pity was considered an acceptable response rather than the current emphasis on empowerment and inclusion," says Golden.

For more in-depth information on employment data for people with disabilities, visit DiversityIncBestPractices.com.

'Disabled'

"[This term] is highly offensive; it negates a person's individuality and reduces her to a category generally perceived as negative," says Golden.

'Special'

"When you say 'special' with the connotation of disability it means that it's been adapted so that it's not at the same level," says Dagit. "In the context of employment, where people want to be competitive and be seen as valuable, it's really helpful to avoid the term 'special' because it means that you're going to need to be held to a different standard rather than expect the same things as you would your other colleagues."

'Wheelchair-Bound'

"Nobody is tied to their wheelchair," says Dagit. "And if the chair has a motor, the best way to refer to it is not an 'electric chair,' because that doesn't have very good connotations, but as a 'power chair.'"

'Gimp' or 'Crip'

Sinocchi makes his objection to this word very clear: "Calling anybody by a derogatory name like that, you just don't do it. It's not funny, it's demeaning and it's only meant to demean."

Etiquette for a Coworker to Ask

In an effort to bridge the gap with a coworker with a disability, people may want to find the most respectful way to address their coworker's disability. Timing, of course, is key. "I strongly suggest that be a conversation that happens after a strong rapport is established," advises Dagit. "But once you get to know the person, you can simply ask them, 'How do you prefer to have your condition referred to?' Rather than have questions in your mind, people with disabilities would generally prefer that they be given the opportunity to give you the right information."

When colleagues ask Sinocchi about why he uses a wheelchair, he makes a point of being open. "It goes back to knowing who you are, knowing how you're perceived by other people, and then operating that way," he says. "I'm not saying operate to the stereotypes, but operate to that level where you understand where people are coming from because they're unfamiliar with you."

Given the sensitive subject, though, you may not always end up with a simple resolution. "By asking about word preferences, a coworker indicates respect for the individual but may find that there is no one solution to the PC of words that will satisfy everyone," says Starnes.

Click here to watch a video featuring Merck & Co.'s Dagit talking about how reality TV has changed the way others see her.

For more pointers on successful workplace communication with people with disabilities, read 'But You Look So Good!' and 7 Other Things NOT to Say to a Person With a Non-Visible Disability and check out our disability roundtable in the Nov./Dec. 2009 issue of DiversityInc magazine.

 

Your opinions and thoughts...
Posted Tuesday Oct 27, 2009 by Guest;
We have sexist, racist but there is no accepted word for those who practice disability discrimination, I like disability bigot but most newspapers won't print the comment..
Posted Tuesday Oct 27, 2009 by Guest;
Is 'disabled' really a "highly offensive" term on-par with the others listed? I think Jim Sinocchi's approach is sensible: reasonable people don't need word lists to inform them how to be respectful, thoughtful, and considerate. (Most of Diversity Inc's audience, even less so.) .
Posted Tuesday Oct 27, 2009 by Guest;
I had a meeting discussing some of those things in my business recently, and one thing we talked about is making sure the terms we use are accurate. One time, a coworker used "differently abled" to describe another worker, and the person she was talking to (an arabic speaking individual) seemed very confused and didn't understand how someone could be "differently abled." I've ran into this with native english speakers as well, and usually after saying differently abled, they almost always ask, "In what way?" Implying they have certain talents, skills, etc..
Posted Tuesday Oct 27, 2009 by Guest;
Why are co-workers describing other workers as "disabled", no matter what term they use? Is that the only distinguishing feature they have? I have a grandson with Down Syndrome. He is most often described as the sweet little boy with the big blue eyes. He has phyical disabilities, special phyical and communication needs, etc., but there is a lot more to him than having Down Syndrome. To us, he HAS Down Syndrome, just as I HAVE arthritis, for which I have a handicap parking permit, but there is no reason for anyone to describe me as the lady with arthritis. I understand there are some terms that should not be used because they are highly offensive, but why are we discussing which term to use to describe someone with disabilities? Their disability should not be discussed in a forum where they would be defined by it..
Posted Tuesday Oct 27, 2009 by Guest;
I have to take issue with this article. I don't think it is entirely accurate, nor does it capture any of the diversity that exists WITHIN the disability community. As is the case with many minority groups, people with disabilities have reclaimed some of these words and use them with pride. The term "disabled", which is offensive in some contexts, is also an identity. Many people with disabilities identify themselves as disabled, the same way that people identify as gay or lesbian. The term carries with it a sense of belonging to a group or community as well as a sense of pride. Similarly, the words "gimp" or "crip" are often used within the disability community, particularly among disabled artists. Let me be clear, I have not heard these words used in any appropriate way by members outside the community to describe people with disabilities, but I think it is important to note that some of these terms carry a strong positive meaning for some people with disabilities. Ultimately what is important is that you treat people with disabilities as PEOPLE. If you slip up and use an offensive term, apologize and move on..
Posted Tuesday Oct 27, 2009 by Guest;
I have multiple disabilities, and I have heard every word in the book used to describe disabled people. I refer to myself as disabled, as I do not consider this to be an offensive term. Some in the disabled community will use the words gimp or crip to refer to each other, but find it offensive if an able-bodied (AB) person to use the terms. I find this double standard to be ridiculous, and I hate both terms. I do not use them at all. As for the words listed in the story, I find all of them, except disabled, to be terribly offensive. I particularly dislike the term handicapped, because of the origin of the word. For those who do not know, it comes from the phrase 'hand in cap,' stemming from a time when disabled people were forced to beg on the street for money, as they were unable to get work. They would sit on the street with a cap on the ground to collect donations. When someone would give money, they would have to put their 'hand in the cap.' This was eventually shortened to handicap. I hate this term because it indicates that I have to rely on others for my every need instead of relying on my own abilities. If someone uses a term I disagree with, I will let them know, in a reasonable way, that I find the term offensive and ask them not to use the term. I hope that, by informing them that the term is offensive, they will learn to use better, more inclusive terms..
Posted Tuesday Oct 27, 2009 by Guest;
Disabled is a very offensive term and, when I hear people refer to "the disabled" as though we are a category rather than people, I refer to them as "the abled". The best thing for anyone to do is to refer to the person by name or as a person. Look at their abilities rather than their disabilities. Life will be better for everyone then..
Posted Wednesday Oct 28, 2009 by Guest;
Other words for disability: Extra help, Certain limitation, extra care needed. , Assisted. Care Plus .
Posted Wednesday Oct 28, 2009 by Guest;
I wanted to make a comment on the comments, not so much the article. To "the lady with arthritis" you are absolutely right, we are all people first, most of us, including people with severe disabilities, do not consider that one characteristic as our defining characteristic. I am many things, none of which by itself could ever describe me wholly. To the individual looking for an accepted word for those who practice disability discrimination, “ableism” is a word that is often used. As one commenter mentioned, as long as you value human beings like human beings, if you happen to use a word that is inappropriate, just apologize and move on. We're all human, we all make mistakes. This is excellent advice. Finally, if you think your company could use some additional training, there are many (often times free) resources in your community, nationwide. One such are Independent Living Centers, non-profit agencies located across the country. A list can be found here: http://www.calky.org/links.html#Centers_For_Independent_Living .
Posted Wednesday Oct 28, 2009 by Guest;
One more thought – I am always unpleasantly jarred by the pejorative use of the word “blind” when one means ignorant or unaware. I know most speakers mean no offense and don’t really equate lack of eyesight with ignorance, etc. But there are wonderful alternatives that can convey the speaker’s intent (ignorant, unaware, closed to possibilities, etc.) I would encourage everyone to stop using “blind” as a stand-in for a negative concept and instead use a word without ties to a particular disability..
Posted Wednesday Oct 28, 2009 by Guest;
As a person with a severe hearing impairment of which I was not born with I have yet to meet a company that knows how to deal with interviews, training or integrating a hearing impaired person into their staff. Many of the companies listed as top diversity companies on this website are clueless when it comes to interviewing a hearing impaired person. I know as I have dealt with a few of them. It appears that most people are uncomfortable being around someone who has mental or physical limitations. My only advice is treat them the way you would want to be treated because it could be you by accident or illness one day..
Posted Thursday Oct 29, 2009 by Guest;
No, no, no! The word "handicap" does not have its origins in the image of a beggar. That doesn't even make sense, as a beggar would have his/her "cap in hand," not the other way around. Once upon a time, "hand in cap" was a gambling game and it is from there that we derive the word handicap, which essentially means "a disadvantage in achieving success." We see this term in golf, horseracing, bowling, etc. I much prefer "handicap" (I have a disadvantage) over "disabled" (I am not able). To those who think we should use any word at all... I'm sorry, but we need to in certain situations. Whether you need to get that parking sticker, have special equipment put in your home, or get some sort of accomodation at work, you need to identify the fact that you are handicapped and need something to make your life more comfortable and your ability to succeed more equitable..
Posted Thursday Oct 29, 2009 by Guest;
The word challenged? That is if you have to even use a word..
Posted Thursday Oct 29, 2009 by Guest;
I think that "person with disabilities" or "a person with [insert disability here]" are perfectly fine and all that we need. It puts the person first, and still recognizes the reality that said person has difficulty performing a certain life function. I'd probably laugh or even be more insulted if someone called me "differently abled". It's so cheeseball, it feels like the person is talking down to me like a child, and it just sounds pretty dumb - everyone in the entire world is "differently abled"..
Posted Saturday Oct 31, 2009 by Guest;
I think too many people get hung up on words and PC malarkey. If you are not comfortable with your disability, you are not ready to enter the work force. I'm a blind person and blind is fine with me. I don't like words like visually different or visually challenged. My disability wont disappear because I refer to it in other terms then what it is. .
Posted Wednesday Nov 4, 2009 by Guest;
Personally I am sick and tired of other people telling ME how I should or should not be addressed. Or even refer to myself for that matter. THAT to me is offensive. I AM American Indian (MY ethnicity) and that is how I refer to myself. Yet non-Indians are constantly correcting me, saying that I am not being "politically correct" and should be using the term "Native American". Excuse me but, if you were born in the U.S., YOU ARE "Native" American. Just as being born in California makes me a "Native Californian". I also have an L-5/S-1 spinal injury that has left me a "Hemiplegic"...Therefore I am a 'handicapped" person who is at times, "wheelchair bound". I refer to myself as a "gimp" because I walk with a limp. Using what I consider a fun term to describe myself is how I cope with what has happened TO ME. And lastly, on MY car I have a "Disabled" license plate. I am what I am, so GET OVER IT!.
Posted Friday Nov 6, 2009 by Guest;
Owning a disability is one thing, but letting it own you is another. Many people need to be trained to look at the person's skills and abilities first. If the candidate didn't think he/she could do the job; he/she would not be there in the first place. It is what a person can bring to the table, not what the thinks that the candidate cannot do. Employers need to learn that they cannot throw people who are skilled to the waste side..
Posted Wednesday Nov 11, 2009 by Guest;
I took the section about "disabled" being offensive to refer to its use as a generic label -- "Mabel is disabled" -- rather than talk about Mabel as a staff person with a role first. Generically, I've always preferred to say "employees working with disabilities" because of the emphasis on their contribution first. Probably the whole "People First" ethos that emerged in the disabilities community years ago is still valuable and operative as the guiding principle..
Posted Monday Nov 16, 2009 by Guest;
Interesting article. I think we need to understand that terminology is ever-evolving. What once was commonplace and acceptable is no longer so, but we need to cut people some slack when they obviously did not mean to offend. I have been taken to taken to task for using the term "MS patient" when referring to myself, rather than saying I am a person with MS. However, it's all about context. If I were asked to describe myself, I likely wouldn't even mention that I have MS, but if I'm writing an article specifically about MS, describing myself as an MS patient among other MS patients seems to make sense in the context of the article. It's hard to get society to come to agreement on acceptable terms and takes decades for changes to become ingrained. Of course, people who deliberately insult or intend to hurt others should be called on it. .
Posted Monday Nov 16, 2009 by Guest;
We are people first so what if we have crook legs and need to use a wheelchair to get around or use a white cane to find our way around. We are disabled by society whether it be by the lack of physical access to the built environment or by coultural stigmars/clasifications put in place over time by seciety. Why even mention "disability" a person is a person you do not (well most people do not) treat someone with red hair different to someone with blond hair. The perso is a person and "differently abled" get real we/everyone is differently abled some can swim good but I have yet to see one of them to come close to my ability as an access consultant..
Posted Friday Apr 2, 2010 by Guest;
The "DAPWID (Differentially Abled Person With Disability)" could be, the choice to the normal person, who could be identified easily with their specialities..

Comment on this article   
Name:
E-mail Address:
Comments:*


Be notified when we post new Disability articles on our website!
We will not sell or share your email address, ever! Please read our Privacy Policy.
Subscribe to the print edition of our magazine: Click Here To Subscribe

Career Search


Quick Search Advanced Search