<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: ATWG: Why I&#8217;m Ashamed of Sen. McCain</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.diversityinc.com/ask-the-white-guy/atwg-why-im-ashamed-of-sen-mccain/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.diversityinc.com/ask-the-white-guy/atwg-why-im-ashamed-of-sen-mccain/</link>
	<description>DiversityInc: Diversity and the Bottom Line</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Apr 2013 18:40:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.diversityinc.com/ask-the-white-guy/atwg-why-im-ashamed-of-sen-mccain/comment-page-1/#comment-1052</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Sep 2010 17:48:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-1052</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Luke,
I respectfully disagree with you, but I must say that your service to our great country entitles you to your strong conviction. I also believe your dedication to the principles of diversity makes you a national hero as well.  S/F  R
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Luke,<br />
I respectfully disagree with you, but I must say that your service to our great country entitles you to your strong conviction. I also believe your dedication to the principles of diversity makes you a national hero as well.  S/F  R</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.diversityinc.com/ask-the-white-guy/atwg-why-im-ashamed-of-sen-mccain/comment-page-1/#comment-1051</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Sep 2010 11:01:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-1051</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This seems to be a very partisan article.  Did the readers miss the fact that Harry Reid voted against the bill.  Why target John McCain? He is a National Hero.  He has earned the right to speak his mind regarding our National Defense. What did John McCain say? ...&quot;wait for the study&quot; ...and &quot;[My] strong conviction [is that] this is not the time to perturb the force&quot;. He is concerned about our national security.  Btw, to the reader who said &quot;if &quot;the Commander-in-Chief says the military will return to riding horses, and using swords instead of guns&quot; I offer that he would probably be impeached instantly for jeopardizing our national security. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This seems to be a very partisan article.  Did the readers miss the fact that Harry Reid voted against the bill.  Why target John McCain? He is a National Hero.  He has earned the right to speak his mind regarding our National Defense. What did John McCain say? &#8230;&#8221;wait for the study&#8221; &#8230;and &#8220;[My] strong conviction [is that] this is not the time to perturb the force&#8221;. He is concerned about our national security.  Btw, to the reader who said &#8220;if &#8220;the Commander-in-Chief says the military will return to riding horses, and using swords instead of guns&#8221; I offer that he would probably be impeached instantly for jeopardizing our national security. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.diversityinc.com/ask-the-white-guy/atwg-why-im-ashamed-of-sen-mccain/comment-page-1/#comment-1050</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Sep 2010 00:57:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-1050</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Excellent article.  Excellent responses to nonsensical haters.  I too used to be a fan of McCain.  I have a hard time believing McCain believes what he touts, but now he has sold out beyond the point of return and can no longer be considered a leader.  A man who stands for nothing will fall for anything.  He has fallen on the wrong side of history and so will his legacy.  This will be his punishment.  Once the silent majority wakes up (and we are walking up), the loud mouths in the margin will be appropriately marginalized and further freedom and equality will be disseminated.  DADT will be repealed (be it Congress or Executive Order (by our elected leader) and the haters will find another subject to hate on... Debate will ensue, what&#039;s right will prevail and progress will continue.. And again, and again.  Doesn&#039;t it always?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent article.  Excellent responses to nonsensical haters.  I too used to be a fan of McCain.  I have a hard time believing McCain believes what he touts, but now he has sold out beyond the point of return and can no longer be considered a leader.  A man who stands for nothing will fall for anything.  He has fallen on the wrong side of history and so will his legacy.  This will be his punishment.  Once the silent majority wakes up (and we are walking up), the loud mouths in the margin will be appropriately marginalized and further freedom and equality will be disseminated.  DADT will be repealed (be it Congress or Executive Order (by our elected leader) and the haters will find another subject to hate on&#8230; Debate will ensue, what&#8217;s right will prevail and progress will continue.. And again, and again.  Doesn&#8217;t it always?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.diversityinc.com/ask-the-white-guy/atwg-why-im-ashamed-of-sen-mccain/comment-page-1/#comment-1049</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Sep 2010 18:29:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-1049</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Military and retired military folks always get credit for fighting for freedom. It&#039;s pretty ironic when they don&#039;t support freedom for LGBT folks as well as everybody else. Hurrah for Admiral Mike Mullen.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Military and retired military folks always get credit for fighting for freedom. It&#8217;s pretty ironic when they don&#8217;t support freedom for LGBT folks as well as everybody else. Hurrah for Admiral Mike Mullen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.diversityinc.com/ask-the-white-guy/atwg-why-im-ashamed-of-sen-mccain/comment-page-1/#comment-1048</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Sep 2010 16:27:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-1048</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I would politely suggest that this article, including describing Sen McCain as a &quot;bulwark of bigotry&quot; tends to, itself, come across as a piece of bigotry.  At some point for a discussion on this topic to have credibility, or even cogency, it must address the lines of reasoning on both sides of the issue.  This article does not, and thus has the character of being propaganda -- a result of being one-sided and incomplete.  If Diversity is truly about &quot;each individual being valued, respected, and included&quot;, then it works for all points of view -- even those you personally disagree with, or feel uncomfortable about.  Is &quot;Diversity, Inc.&quot; really truly, fully about Diversity, or is it a cover for a political agenda?

One key quote in this article underscores that there is an agenda to this, rather than truly being about Diversity -- &quot;The time for action is now&#8212;and the president needs to sign another executive order.&quot;  The idea of using a Presidential action is an attempt to bypass a couple of key principles of American government -- one being &quot;government of the people, by the people, and for the people&quot;, the other being checks-and-balances.  But apparently this article isn&#039;t interested in the Democratic process, and promotes a method to implement its agenda regardless of there being significant reasons for not implementing the agenda -- reasons conveniently not addressed in this article.

If this is about Diversity, then let&#039;s see it reflected in how controversial issues are reviewed, and not resort to &quot;tactics of discrimination&quot; like name-calling, stereotyping, and marginalizing.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would politely suggest that this article, including describing Sen McCain as a &#8220;bulwark of bigotry&#8221; tends to, itself, come across as a piece of bigotry.  At some point for a discussion on this topic to have credibility, or even cogency, it must address the lines of reasoning on both sides of the issue.  This article does not, and thus has the character of being propaganda &#8212; a result of being one-sided and incomplete.  If Diversity is truly about &#8220;each individual being valued, respected, and included&#8221;, then it works for all points of view &#8212; even those you personally disagree with, or feel uncomfortable about.  Is &#8220;Diversity, Inc.&#8221; really truly, fully about Diversity, or is it a cover for a political agenda?</p>
<p>One key quote in this article underscores that there is an agenda to this, rather than truly being about Diversity &#8212; &#8220;The time for action is now&mdash;and the president needs to sign another executive order.&#8221;  The idea of using a Presidential action is an attempt to bypass a couple of key principles of American government &#8212; one being &#8220;government of the people, by the people, and for the people&#8221;, the other being checks-and-balances.  But apparently this article isn&#8217;t interested in the Democratic process, and promotes a method to implement its agenda regardless of there being significant reasons for not implementing the agenda &#8212; reasons conveniently not addressed in this article.</p>
<p>If this is about Diversity, then let&#8217;s see it reflected in how controversial issues are reviewed, and not resort to &#8220;tactics of discrimination&#8221; like name-calling, stereotyping, and marginalizing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.diversityinc.com/ask-the-white-guy/atwg-why-im-ashamed-of-sen-mccain/comment-page-1/#comment-1047</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Sep 2010 15:43:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-1047</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I remember one night in 1965 crouching down in a perimeter trench at Camp Holloway (Pleiku, Vietnam) awaiting a detected Viet Cong and NVA assault. The last thing on my mind at that moment was whether the guy next to me was gay or not.

That being said, I recall massive racism tolerated by the military, ranging from segregated offbase facilities to a Lieutenant who pulled me over (riding pillion on the moto of a VNAF friend) who chewed me out in front of my English-speaking friend for &quot;not sticking to your own kind&quot; and stating my friend would likely turn me over to the VC for a few dollars. Oh, yes, that kind of stuff really improves military morale!

It seems to me we tend to forget to indoctrinate our military in what we are presumably fighting for - liberty and justice for all. How can we claim the moral high ground when we in fact eschew the moral premise and continue to deny many of our citizens basic rights, whether they are Black, gay or lesbian, or other naturally occurring characteristic?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I remember one night in 1965 crouching down in a perimeter trench at Camp Holloway (Pleiku, Vietnam) awaiting a detected Viet Cong and NVA assault. The last thing on my mind at that moment was whether the guy next to me was gay or not.</p>
<p>That being said, I recall massive racism tolerated by the military, ranging from segregated offbase facilities to a Lieutenant who pulled me over (riding pillion on the moto of a VNAF friend) who chewed me out in front of my English-speaking friend for &#8220;not sticking to your own kind&#8221; and stating my friend would likely turn me over to the VC for a few dollars. Oh, yes, that kind of stuff really improves military morale!</p>
<p>It seems to me we tend to forget to indoctrinate our military in what we are presumably fighting for &#8211; liberty and justice for all. How can we claim the moral high ground when we in fact eschew the moral premise and continue to deny many of our citizens basic rights, whether they are Black, gay or lesbian, or other naturally occurring characteristic?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.diversityinc.com/ask-the-white-guy/atwg-why-im-ashamed-of-sen-mccain/comment-page-1/#comment-1046</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Sep 2010 15:27:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-1046</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[After the failure of the Republicans to remove President Clintion from office,  the 2006 and 2008 election cycles, and the Republicans failed attempts to hijack nationalism, patriotism, and the moral high ground, I am more convinced that ever, that the American people , due in part to it&#039;s demographic shift to racial and ethnic minorities, women,  and people under 35, no longer are as obsessed with sexual orientation as older people are, and don&#039;t see it as a threat to them.  On the other hand, the Republicans are finding themselves on the wrong side of an issue that denies people &quot;life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.&quot;  Their view rest on claims that have no evidence...and John McMame&#039;s limp excuse about letting soldiers to be asked, is ridiculous.  Since when do we ask soldiers about national policy?  That&#039;s what we have elections for.  At the end of the day, if the Commander-in-Chief says the military will return to riding horses, and using swords instead of guns, anyone in the military who doesn&#039;t like it, can leave at the end of their enlistments, or resign if they are commissioned officers. Asking the military about policy is absurd, because it will only produce more confusion.  If the military overwhelmingly says &quot;abolish DADT&quot; the reich-wing will then say, &quot;we should survey retirees, their famillies, our allies, our potential enemies,&quot; etc, etc.&quot;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After the failure of the Republicans to remove President Clintion from office,  the 2006 and 2008 election cycles, and the Republicans failed attempts to hijack nationalism, patriotism, and the moral high ground, I am more convinced that ever, that the American people , due in part to it&#8217;s demographic shift to racial and ethnic minorities, women,  and people under 35, no longer are as obsessed with sexual orientation as older people are, and don&#8217;t see it as a threat to them.  On the other hand, the Republicans are finding themselves on the wrong side of an issue that denies people &#8220;life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.&#8221;  Their view rest on claims that have no evidence&#8230;and John McMame&#8217;s limp excuse about letting soldiers to be asked, is ridiculous.  Since when do we ask soldiers about national policy?  That&#8217;s what we have elections for.  At the end of the day, if the Commander-in-Chief says the military will return to riding horses, and using swords instead of guns, anyone in the military who doesn&#8217;t like it, can leave at the end of their enlistments, or resign if they are commissioned officers. Asking the military about policy is absurd, because it will only produce more confusion.  If the military overwhelmingly says &#8220;abolish DADT&#8221; the reich-wing will then say, &#8220;we should survey retirees, their famillies, our allies, our potential enemies,&#8221; etc, etc.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.diversityinc.com/ask-the-white-guy/atwg-why-im-ashamed-of-sen-mccain/comment-page-1/#comment-1045</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Sep 2010 13:49:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-1045</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I agree with you!  I support repeal of the DADT . . . or an executive order.

I am a non-white, heterosexual male.  No history of LGBT in either side of my family nor my wife&#039;s family.  I have friends who exhibits tendencies of a gay or a lesbian.  I work and have worked withgays and lesbian.  Have never waste my time to asked their sexual orientation.  Not interested at all if they are gay / lesbian.  I am an independent voter who had admired John McCain . . . unfortunately,  he is loosing my support for his actions the last 18 or twenty months. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with you!  I support repeal of the DADT . . . or an executive order.</p>
<p>I am a non-white, heterosexual male.  No history of LGBT in either side of my family nor my wife&#8217;s family.  I have friends who exhibits tendencies of a gay or a lesbian.  I work and have worked withgays and lesbian.  Have never waste my time to asked their sexual orientation.  Not interested at all if they are gay / lesbian.  I am an independent voter who had admired John McCain . . . unfortunately,  he is loosing my support for his actions the last 18 or twenty months. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.diversityinc.com/ask-the-white-guy/atwg-why-im-ashamed-of-sen-mccain/comment-page-1/#comment-1044</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Sep 2010 13:36:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-1044</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Fantastic piece! In the end, bullets really don&#039;t care if you&#039;re gay or straight.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fantastic piece! In the end, bullets really don&#8217;t care if you&#8217;re gay or straight.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.diversityinc.com/ask-the-white-guy/atwg-why-im-ashamed-of-sen-mccain/comment-page-1/#comment-1043</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Sep 2010 12:56:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-1043</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Good always comes from bad.  It took the failure of repealing DADT for you to see John McCain clearly.  Ha Ha]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good always comes from bad.  It took the failure of repealing DADT for you to see John McCain clearly.  Ha Ha</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>